Editorial Type: Case Reports
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 May 2020

Excessive Cyclosporine-Associated Immunosuppression in a Dog Heterozygous for the MDR1 (ABCB1-1Δ) Mutation

BVMS, DACVIM,
DVM, PhD,
DVM,
DVM, PhD,
DVM, MS, PhD, and
DVM, MS
Article Category: Research Article
Page Range: 190 – 195
DOI: 10.5326/JAAHA-MS-7004
Save
Download PDF

ABSTRACT

Pharmacodynamic monitoring was used to titrate cyclosporine dosing in a dog with immune-mediated hemolytic anemia. Development of a suspected secondary infection, with subsequent discovery of an unexpectedly high level of T-cell suppression despite a relatively low cyclosporine dose, prompted an investigation into the cause of possible excessive immunosuppression. Blood cyclosporine concentrations were within expected target ranges, and the dog was determined to be heterozygous for the multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1; ATP-binding cassette sub family B member 1-1Δ) gene mutation. The MDR1 mutation was suspected to have contributed to the excessive immunosuppression experienced by this patient. This case highlights the need to monitor immunosuppressive therapy in the individual patient, especially when the patient is not responding to therapy at typical dosages or when secondary infections develop at dosages lower than expected to cause significant immunosuppression. Pharmacodynamic monitoring can be used to help identify unexpected excessive immunosuppression in dogs receiving cyclosporine, and MDR1 genotyping should be further explored as a potential method of predicting and preventing its occurrence.

Introduction

Immunosuppressive therapy with drugs such as prednisone, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclosporine is standardly recommended for the treatment of dogs with immune-mediated hemolytic anemia.1 Pharmacodynamic monitoring (measurement of “what the drug does to the body”) is now available for potent immunosuppressive drugs such as cyclosporine and can be used to adjust drug doses, especially in patients that do not respond to therapy or develop significant adverse effects.2,3 Molecular assays are now also available to detect gene mutations that may predispose dogs to alterations in drug metabolism, including multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1) genotyping. This case report illustrates how newer diagnostic techniques such as pharmacodynamic monitoring can be used to identify unexpected excessive immunosuppression in dogs receiving immunosuppressive drugs such as cyclosporine as well as how MDR1 genotyping can be used to explore potential mechanisms of excessive suppression.

Case Report

Presentation

A 5 yr old spayed female border collie mix weighing 31.8 kg presented to her primary care veterinarian for anorexia and lethargy of 1 day duration. On physical examination, the dog was tachycardic with a heart rate of 128 bpm and febrile with a temperature of 40.3°C. Splenomegaly was noted on abdominal palpation. The remainder of the physical examination was unremarkable.

Diagnostic Investigation

A complete blood count revealed a mild decrease in hematocrit (33% [reference interval (RI) 36–60%]), mild decrease in hemoglobin (11.5 g/dL [RI 12.1–20.3 g/dL]), moderate macrocytosis (87 fL [RI 58–79]), mild hyperchromasia (30.3 pg [RI 19–28 pg]), and a moderate rubricytosis (4 nucleated red blood cells per 100 white blood cells [RI 0–1/100 white blood cells]). A white blood cell differential revealed a mild lymphopenia (657 lymphocytes/µL [RI 690–4500/µL]). Microagglutination (no saline dilution was performed to rule out rouleaux formation), slight spherocytosis, and moderate polychromasia were observed on blood smear examination by a boarded clinical pathologist. The corrected reticulocyte count was 2% (considered an appropriate response if above 1% in the dog) with an absolute reticulocyte count of 110,200/µL (RI <60,000/µL) indicating moderate red blood cell regeneration. On serum biochemistry there was mild hyperbilirubinemia (0.7 mg/dL [RI 0.1–0.3 mg/dL]) and mild hypokalemia (3.4 mEq/L [RI 3.6–5.5 mEq/L]). A total T4 was within normal limits. On urinalysis, the urine was moderately alkaline (pH 7.5 [RI 5.5–7.0]) with mild proteinuria (1+) and a specific gravity of 1.037. An occult heartworm antigen test was negative. Abdominal radiographs were performed, revealing splenomegaly, which was further confirmed via ultrasound.

The following day, the results of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) canine tick-borne panel profile through Antech Diagnostics were available and were negative for all organisms tested including Anaplasma phagocytophilum, A platys, Babesia canis, Babesia spp. (noncanis), Bartonella henselae, B vinsonii, E canis, Erlichia spp., Mycoplasma haemocanis/haematoparvum, Neorickettsia risticii, and Rickettsia rickettsii. Serum samples were subsequently submitted to the North Carolina State University vector borne diagnostic laboratory for immunofluorescent assay for B canis and B gibsoni and PCR for Babesia and Bartonella spp., to Galaxy Diagnostics for PCR and culture for Bartonella spp., and to the Colorado State University veterinary diagnostic laboratory for PCR for M haemocanis and M haematoparvum. Results were all reported as negative.

Therapy

Initial therapy, commenced by the primary care veterinarian while awaiting further diagnostics, focused on treating potential tick-borne illness and possible immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA). The patient was prescribed oral doxycycline (5 mg/kg per os [PO] q 12 hr, 10 day course) and prednisone (1 mg/kg PO q 12 hr).

Given the presence of spherocytosis and microagglutination accompanying a regenerative and apparently hemolytic anemia, the negative test results for infectious disease, and the lack of evidence of other underlying disorders, a provisional diagnosis of primary IMHA was established. Based the recently published American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine consensus statement on the diagnosis of IMHA, the dog would have been classified with a diagnostic category of “Supportive of IMHA,” with one sign of immune-mediated destruction (spherocytes), and one sign of hemolysis (hyperbilirubinemia).4 One day after presentation, oral azathioprine (1.6 mg/kg PO q 24 hr) was prescribed, along with aspirin (0.6 mg/kg PO q 24 hr) and famotidine (1 mg/kg PO q 24 hr) in an attempt to reduce the likelihood of pulmonary thromboembolism and gastric ulceration, respectively. Over the following 2 days, the hematocrit continued to decrease to 22%; therefore, the azathioprine dose was increased to 1.6 mg/kg PO q 24 hr for 5 days/wk and 1.6 mg/kg PO q 12 hr for 2 days/wk (Wednesday and Saturday), for an average daily dose of 2 mg/kg. Minimal improvement in hematocrit was observed with immunosuppressive therapy over the next 2 wk; therefore, compounded cyclosporinea (3.1 mg/kg PO q 12 hr) was added concurrently to the prednisone and azathioprine in an effort to increase the degree of immunosuppression.

Over the next 4 days, the patient began acting more lethargic and having soft stools. Azathioprine was discontinued, prednisone dose rate was decreased (from 1 mg/kg to 0.7 mg/kg PO q 12 hr), and cyclosporine dose rate was increased to 3.1 mg/kg PO q 8 hr. S-adenosylmethionine was commenced as a potential hepatoprotectant owing to elevations in liver enzymes (aspartate aminotransferase 76 U/L [RI 15–66 U/L], alanine aminotransferase 280 U/L [RI 12–118 U/L], alkaline phosphatase 1938 U/L [RI 5–131 U/L], and gamma-glutamyl transferase 232 U/L [RI 1–12 U/L]) detected on repeat serum chemistry. Two days after starting the new regimen, hematocrit had further decreased to 21%, and other measures of disease activity (including spherocytosis and hyperbilirubinemia) had persisted; therefore, prednisone dose was increased back to 1 mg/kg PO q 12 hr and an additional immunosuppressive agent, mycophenolate mofetil (10 mg/kg PO q 12 hr), was added. Two days later, cyclosporine dose was adjusted to 4.7 mg/kg PO q 12 hr.

Five days later, the patient developed an open wound with a draining clear discharge on her right lateral hip, which was hypothesized to have been due to infection secondary to significant suppression of the immune system. Mycophenolate mofetil was discontinued, and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (27.5 mg/kg PO q 12 hr) and enrofloxacin (2.2 mg/kg PO q 12 hr) were commenced. The lesion did not improve over the following 48 hr; therefore, prednisone and cyclosporine dosage rates were decreased to 1 mg/kg PO q 24 hr and 3.3 mg/kg PO q 12 hr, respectively, and melatonin (0.1 mg/kg PO q 12 hr) was commenced as a potential immunomodulating agent.5 Although the draining lesion healed over the following week, the patient developed cystic and exudative lesions on the dorsorostral muzzle, tail, and perianal region, which then improved over the next 3 days with continued antibiotic therapy.

Outcome

Given the ongoing challenges associated with maintaining a level of immunosuppression that controlled IMHA without resulting in suspected secondary infection, the primary care veterinarian sought to fine-tune the cyclosporine doses by sending a blood sample to the Mississippi State University (MSU) Pharmacodynamic Laboratory for measurement of activated whole blood expression of interleukin-2 (IL-2) messenger RNA (mRNA) using a quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assay.2,3,69 On a blood sample collected approximately 2 hr after administration of the morning dose of oral cyclosporine, IL-2 mRNA expression was found to be markedly suppressed (0% of control samples). The MSU Pharmacodynamic Laboratory defines “marked” suppression of IL-2 expression as less than 5% of cytokine expression of normal control samples. This was an unexpected result given the relatively low dose of cyclosporine the patient was on at the time of submission (3.3 mg/kg q 12 hr). Typically, marked suppression of cytokine levels is most often observed by the MSU Pharmacodynamic Laboratory when patients are on significantly higher cyclosporine dosages (unpublished data): a starting dose of 5 mg/kg orally q 12 hr is typically recommended for systemic immunosuppression in dogs, with the expectation that, in most dogs, this will cause suppression in the moderate range or higher when dogs are dosed with the standard modified (microemulsified) preparation of cyclosporine. The MSU Pharmacodynamic Laboratory defines “moderate” suppression of IL-2 expression as between 25 and 50% of cytokine expression of normal control samples, and “moderate to high” as between 5 and 25%.

Given the high level of IL-2 suppression in response to a relatively low cyclosporine dosage, 3.3 mg/kg q 12 hr, a recommendation to the primary care veterinarian was made to decrease the cyclosporine dose. Prior to dose reduction, a peak (2 hr after morning drug administration) cyclosporine blood concentration was measured through the Auburn University Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory to rule out an error in drug formulation, because the cyclosporine preparation had been compounded. The blood cyclosporine concentration was 1183 ng/mL. Although the cyclosporine concentration was within the Auburn Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory target therapeutic range for peak drug concentrations (400–1400 ng/mL), it was significantly lower, by a factor of two- to five-fold, than the peak drug concentration associated with high levels of T-cell suppression of IL-2 in pharmacodynamic studies in normal dogs.10

Because of the patient’s high degree of T-cell sensitivity to cyclosporine, the MDR1 gene mutation was considered to be a potential cause of heightened drug sensitivity. The MDR1 gene, also known as ATP-binding cassette sub family B member 1 (ABCB1) or permeability glycoprotein (P-glycoprotein) gene, encodes an efflux pump, which functions as a drug transporter for numerous agents, including cyclosporine.11 Prevalence of MDR1 gene mutation (ABCB1-1Δ) is known to be higher in certain breeds, especially those of herding heritage, with the collie having the highest frequency.12 The mutation has been described in the border collie as well, although prevalence is much less frequent compared with other herding breeds.12 Dogs that are homozygous for the mutation have no P-glycoprotein function owing to a stop codon that ends synthesis of the protein prematurely, rendering it nonfunctional.13 Heterozygotes are also affected by the mutation and exhibit reduced P-glycoprotein function. A blood sample was sent to the Washington State University Veterinary Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory for DNA analysis, and the patient was found to be a heterozygote (mutant/normal) for the MDR1 gene mutation.

Subsequent samples submitted to the MSU Pharmacodynamic Laboratory after a reduction in cyclosporine dose rates demonstrated a significant decrease in T-cell suppression compared with initial qRT-PCR assay results. A second assay performed 8 wk after a marked cyclosporine dosage reduction (to 0.95 mg/kg PO q 12 hr) showed low levels of T-cell suppression. Because the anemia was not under control at this point (hematocrit 30%), the cyclosporine dosage was increased to 1.8 mg/kg PO q 12 hr. On repeat of the assay a few weeks later, qRT-PCR results again were reflective of low suppression, although anemia was adequately controlled (hematocrit 41%) and the owners reported that the patient was back to normal activity, with resolution of previous draining lesions. Because the patient appeared to be doing well clinically, a dose change was not recommended. A chronological diagram of the patient’s cyclosporine dose and IL-2 mRNA expression results over the course of her treatment is summarized in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1. Chronological report of cyclosporine dose and interleukin-2 (IL-2) messenger RNA (mRNA) expression over the course of treatment. Day 0 = First day of presentation for anemia; Black line = Dose rate of modified cyclosporine in mg/kg q 12 hr, ranging from a highest dose rate of 4.72 mg/kg q 12 hr to a lowest dose rate of 0.95 mg/kg q 12 hr; Black dotted line = Transition between cyclosporine dose rates; Red dashed line = Standard starting dose rate of modified cyclosporine of 5 mg/kg q 12 hr, as recommended in the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine consensus statement on treatment of immune-mediated hemolytic anemia1; Gray bar graphs = Activated whole blood expression of patient IL-2 mRNA using a quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay as a percentage of a normal control sample (Day 40 = 0% of control, or “marked suppression” [0–5% of control], Days 93 and 124 = 55.5 and 57.2% of control, respectively, or “low suppression” [50–75% of control]); Light blue range and darker blue ranges = Laboratory recommended target ranges for IL-2 suppression of “moderate suppression” (20–50% of control) or “moderate to high suppression” (5–20% of control), respectively; and Green arrow = First day of suspected infection. Note: Marked suppression of IL-2 expression (0% of control) was detected on Day 40, at a cyclosporine dose rate (3.3 mg/kg q 12 hr) that was lower than the standard recommended starting dose rate of 5 mg/kg q 12 hr.FIGURE 1. Chronological report of cyclosporine dose and interleukin-2 (IL-2) messenger RNA (mRNA) expression over the course of treatment. Day 0 = First day of presentation for anemia; Black line = Dose rate of modified cyclosporine in mg/kg q 12 hr, ranging from a highest dose rate of 4.72 mg/kg q 12 hr to a lowest dose rate of 0.95 mg/kg q 12 hr; Black dotted line = Transition between cyclosporine dose rates; Red dashed line = Standard starting dose rate of modified cyclosporine of 5 mg/kg q 12 hr, as recommended in the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine consensus statement on treatment of immune-mediated hemolytic anemia1; Gray bar graphs = Activated whole blood expression of patient IL-2 mRNA using a quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay as a percentage of a normal control sample (Day 40 = 0% of control, or “marked suppression” [0–5% of control], Days 93 and 124 = 55.5 and 57.2% of control, respectively, or “low suppression” [50–75% of control]); Light blue range and darker blue ranges = Laboratory recommended target ranges for IL-2 suppression of “moderate suppression” (20–50% of control) or “moderate to high suppression” (5–20% of control), respectively; and Green arrow = First day of suspected infection. Note: Marked suppression of IL-2 expression (0% of control) was detected on Day 40, at a cyclosporine dose rate (3.3 mg/kg q 12 hr) that was lower than the standard recommended starting dose rate of 5 mg/kg q 12 hr.FIGURE 1. Chronological report of cyclosporine dose and interleukin-2 (IL-2) messenger RNA (mRNA) expression over the course of treatment. Day 0 = First day of presentation for anemia; Black line = Dose rate of modified cyclosporine in mg/kg q 12 hr, ranging from a highest dose rate of 4.72 mg/kg q 12 hr to a lowest dose rate of 0.95 mg/kg q 12 hr; Black dotted line = Transition between cyclosporine dose rates; Red dashed line = Standard starting dose rate of modified cyclosporine of 5 mg/kg q 12 hr, as recommended in the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine consensus statement on treatment of immune-mediated hemolytic anemia1; Gray bar graphs = Activated whole blood expression of patient IL-2 mRNA using a quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay as a percentage of a normal control sample (Day 40 = 0% of control, or “marked suppression” [0–5% of control], Days 93 and 124 = 55.5 and 57.2% of control, respectively, or “low suppression” [50–75% of control]); Light blue range and darker blue ranges = Laboratory recommended target ranges for IL-2 suppression of “moderate suppression” (20–50% of control) or “moderate to high suppression” (5–20% of control), respectively; and Green arrow = First day of suspected infection. Note: Marked suppression of IL-2 expression (0% of control) was detected on Day 40, at a cyclosporine dose rate (3.3 mg/kg q 12 hr) that was lower than the standard recommended starting dose rate of 5 mg/kg q 12 hr.
FIGURE 1 Chronological report of cyclosporine dose and interleukin-2 (IL-2) messenger RNA (mRNA) expression over the course of treatment. Day 0 = First day of presentation for anemia; Black line = Dose rate of modified cyclosporine in mg/kg q 12 hr, ranging from a highest dose rate of 4.72 mg/kg q 12 hr to a lowest dose rate of 0.95 mg/kg q 12 hr; Black dotted line = Transition between cyclosporine dose rates; Red dashed line = Standard starting dose rate of modified cyclosporine of 5 mg/kg q 12 hr, as recommended in the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine consensus statement on treatment of immune-mediated hemolytic anemia 1 ; Gray bar graphs = Activated whole blood expression of patient IL-2 mRNA using a quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay as a percentage of a normal control sample (Day 40 = 0% of control, or “marked suppression” [0–5% of control], Days 93 and 124 = 55.5 and 57.2% of control, respectively, or “low suppression” [50–75% of control]); Light blue range and darker blue ranges = Laboratory recommended target ranges for IL-2 suppression of “moderate suppression” (20–50% of control) or “moderate to high suppression” (5–20% of control), respectively; and Green arrow = First day of suspected infection. Note: Marked suppression of IL-2 expression (0% of control) was detected on Day 40, at a cyclosporine dose rate (3.3 mg/kg q 12 hr) that was lower than the standard recommended starting dose rate of 5 mg/kg q 12 hr.

Citation: Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 56, 3; 10.5326/JAAHA-MS-7004

Discussion

Cyclosporine is a T-cell inhibitor used to treat a variety of immune- and inflammatory-mediated diseases in the dog. Cyclosporine binds to the intracellular protein cyclophilin, which then inhibits the enzyme calcineurin and subsequent dephosphorylation of nuclear factor of activated T cells, thus reducing expression of nuclear factor of activated T cells–regulated cytokines such as IL-2 and interferon-gamma.2,7,8,14 Cyclosporine is known to have variable oral bioavailability, leading to unpredictable blood drug levels in individual patients.15 Additionally, at comparable blood cyclosporine concentrations, the effects on individual patient T cells can vary markedly. For this reason, a pharmacodynamic qRT-PCR assay measuring expression of the genes coding for IL-2 in activated T cells was developed in order to tailor cyclosporine doses in human transplant medicine, and then it was adapted for use in dogs receiving cyclosporine. Because the assay targets a mechanism of action specific to calcineurin inhibitors, it is generally considered to reflect the specific effects of cyclosporine and to not be significantly affected by the concurrent use of other immunosuppressive agents.16

Therapeutic drug monitoring (pharmacodynamic and/or pharmacokinetic monitoring) can be used to adjust doses of immunosuppressive drugs, especially in patients that do not respond to therapy or develop significant adverse effects (including excessive immunosuppression and secondary infection) when receiving standard drug dosages. When the dog described in this case report developed suspected (albeit, in the absence of supportive culture or cytology, incompletely established) secondary infections, although treatment with multiple concurrent immunosuppressive drugs was considered to be a potential contributing factor toward infection, pharmacodynamic monitoring was also recommended in order to ascertain the degree of cyclosporine-associated immunosuppression, and it demonstrated marked suppression of T-cell function. Further investigation of potential reasons for marked T-cell suppression despite relatively low doses of cyclosporine led to the discovery of a mutation in MDR1 gene affecting the P-glycoprotein efflux pump. Worth noting is that the recently published American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine consensus statement on the treatment of IMHA now suggests that the use of three concurrent immunosuppressive drugs (such as prednisone, azathioprine, and cyclosporine) should be avoided when possible, based on the suggestion of an association with more severe adverse effects, including an increased risk of opportunistic infections.1

Within the small intestine, the P-glycoprotein efflux pump helps remove cyclosporine from the enterocyte cytosol back into the intestinal lumen, and in people, efflux pump activity has been proposed as a potential cause of reduced drug bioavailability.11 Although P-glycoprotein deficiency could in theory lead to increased drug bioavailability and increased blood drug concentrations at standard dose rates, this effect has not been observed with cyclosporine in dogs.17,18 P-glycoprotein deficiency can also potentially lead to decreased biliary drug excretion and accumulation of the affected drug in the bloodstream. However, given the patient’s blood drug concentration results, neither increased cyclosporine bioavailability nor increased drug accumulation appear to have occurred in this dog.

T-lymphocytes also express P-glycoprotein on their cell membrane, where it functions to prevent the accumulation of intracellular toxins.19 Because cyclosporine is a substrate for P-glycoprotein, it is possible that deficient P-glycoprotein function, which occurs in dogs with the MDR1 mutation, would result in greater intracellular cyclosporine concentrations, thereby decreasing cytokine production. Consequently, dogs with the MDR1 gene mutation might experience enhanced immunosuppression with cyclosporine doses and blood concentrations that would normally have minimal effect on the immune system of normal dogs. High levels of suppression of IL-2 expression in human patients receiving cyclosporine are associated with an increased susceptibility to secondary infection.

This case illustrates the value of pharmacodynamic monitoring for tailoring individual drug therapy. Many different enzymes, carrier molecules, efflux pumps, and receptor polymorphisms contribute to variation in the pharmacological effects of drugs such as cyclosporine, and the activity of these enzymes, molecules, and pumps is likely to vary from dog to dog based on both inherited and environmental effects. Pharmacodynamic monitoring enables the clinician to bypass many of these variables by measuring the end result of the drug effect in the individual patient. Pharmacodynamic monitoring, when available, is especially important with immunosuppressive agents, because the therapeutic window for these drugs tends to be narrow, with too low of a dose leading to undertreatment and too high of a dose increasing the risk of infection and other drug-related side effects. In this case, pharmacodynamic monitoring of activated T-cell IL-2 expression helped to identify a heightened individual sensitivity to cyclosporine, and subsequent testing for the MDR1 gene mutation then identified a potential cause for this increased sensitivity.

This case also demonstrates the value of genetic testing in breeds with high rates of MDR1 gene mutations when prescribing drugs that are affected by efflux pump function. Drug doses may then need to be adjusted to accommodate reduced P-glycoprotein function. Interestingly, this case illustrates that the MDR1 gene mutation may influence target tissue responses to the drug independent of the effects predicted based on blood drug concentrations alone. Because P-glycoprotein is an important component of the blood–brain barrier, and also pumps drugs out of lymphocytes, the MDR1 gene mutation may lead to heightened sensitivity to the effects of cyclosporine in tissues such as the brain or in individual cells such as the T cell.17 Individual variations in drug processing pathways, including the MDR1 gene, may explain the observation that, even at cyclosporine doses that are generally considered to be minimally immunosuppressive (the 5 mg/kg q 24 hr dose used to treat atopy), individual dogs have previously been reported to get unusual secondary infections.2022

Conclusion

Further research is warranted in dogs with MDR1 gene mutations to better examine the effects of heterozygosity and homozygosity for the mutation on T-cell pharmacodynamic responses to cyclosporine. In particular, in breeds that have a high incidence of the MDR1 mutation, such as the collie and Australian shepherd, clinicians may consider testing for the mutation prior to commencing therapy. In affected dogs requiring systemic immunosuppression, a lower starting dose of cyclosporine (such as 3 mg/kg q 12 hr) may be considered, with subsequent monitoring of T-cell suppression in order to adjust and individualize drug doses.

REFERENCES

  • 1.
    Swann JW
    ,
    GardenOA
    ,
    FellmanCL
    , et al.
    ACVIM consensus statement on the treatment of immune-mediated hemolytic anemia in dogs. J Vet Intern Med2019;33:114172.
  • 2.
    Archer TM
    ,
    FellmanCL
    ,
    StokesJV
    , et al.
    Pharmacodynamic monitoring of canine T-cell cytokine responses to oral cyclosporine. J Vet Intern Med2011;25:13917.
  • 3.
    Riggs C
    ,
    ArcherT
    ,
    FellmanC
    , et al.
    Analytical validation of a quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay for evaluation of T-cell targeted immunosuppressive therapy in the dog. Vet Immunol Immunopathol2013;156:22934.
  • 4.
    Garden OA
    ,
    KiddL
    ,
    MexasAM
    , et al.
    ACVIM consensus statement on the diagnosis of immune-mediated hemolytic anemia in dogs and cats. J Vet Intern Med2019;33:31334.
  • 5.
    Peace AC
    ,
    KumarS
    ,
    WillsR
    , et al.
    Pharmacodynamic evaluation of the effects of oral melatonin on expression of the T-cell cytokines interleukin-2 and interferon gamma in the dog. J Vet Pharmacol Ther2019;42:27884.
  • 6.
    Barten MJ
    ,
    TarnokA
    ,
    GarbadeJ
    , et al.
    Pharmacodynamics of T-cell function for monitoring immunosuppression. Cell Prolif2007;40:5063.
  • 7.
    Fellman CL
    ,
    StokesJV
    ,
    ArcherTM
    , et al.
    Cyclosporine A affects the in vitro expression of T cell activation-related molecules and cytokines in dogs. Vet Immunol Immunopathol2011;140:17580.
  • 8.
    Kobayashi T
    ,
    MomoiY
    ,
    IwasakiT
    . Cyclosporine A inhibits the mRNA expressions of IL-2, IL-4 and IFN-gamma, but not TNF-alpha, in canine mononuclear cells. J Vet Med Sci2007;69:88792.
  • 9.
    Tivers MS
    ,
    CatchpoleB
    ,
    GregorySP
    , et al.
    Interleukin-2 and interferon-gamma mRNA expression in canine anal furunculosis lesions and the effect of ciclosporin therapy. Vet Immunol Immunopathol2008;125:316.
  • 10.
    Fellman CL
    ,
    ArcherTM
    ,
    StokesJV
    , et al.
    Effects of oral cyclosporine on canine T-cell expression of IL-2 and IFN-gamma across a 12-h dosing interval. J Vet Pharmacol Ther2016;39:23744.
  • 11.
    Lown KS
    ,
    MayoRR
    ,
    LeichtmanAB
    , et al.
    Role of intestinal P-glycoprotein (mdr1) in interpatient variation in the oral bioavailability of cyclosporine. Clin Pharmacol Ther1997;62:24860.
  • 12.
    Neff MW
    ,
    RobertsonKR
    ,
    WongAK
    , et al.
    Breed distribution and history of canine mdr1-1Δ, a pharmacogenetic mutation that marks the emergence of breeds from the collie lineage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2004;101:1172530.
  • 13.
    Roulet A
    ,
    PuelO
    ,
    GestaS
    , et al.
    MDR1-deficient genotype in Collie dogs hypersensitive to the P-glycoprotein substrate ivermectin. Eur J Pharmacol2003;460:8591.
  • 14.
    Archer TM
    ,
    BootheDM
    ,
    LangstonVC
    et al.
    Oral cyclosporine treatment in dogs: A review of the literature. J Vet Intern Med2014;28:120.
  • 15.
    Robson D.
    Review of the pharmacokinetics, interactions and adverse reactions of cyclosporine in people, dogs and cats. Vet Rec2003;152:73948.
  • 16.
    Archer T
    ,
    MulliganC
    ,
    NarayananL
    , et al.
    Effects of oral administration of 5 immunosuppressive agents on activated T-cell cytokine expression in healthy dogs. J Vet Intern Med2020; DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15729.
  • 17.
    Schinkel AH
    ,
    WagenaarE
    ,
    van DeemterL
    , et al.
    Absence of the MDR1a P-glycoprotein in mice affects tissue distribution and pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone, digoxin and cyclosporin A. J Clin Invest1995;96:1698705.
  • 18.
    Mealey K W
    ,
    RaunigD
    ,
    SchmidtK
    , et al.
    Oral bioavailability of P-glycoprotein substrate drugs do not differ between ABCD1-1Δ and ABCB1 wild type dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther2010;33:4534.
  • 19.
    Ford J
    ,
    HoggardPG
    ,
    OwenA
    , et al.
    A simplified approach to determining P-glycoprotein expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cell subsets. J Immunol Methods2003;274:12937.
  • 20.
    MacNeil A
    ,
    SteeilJ
    ,
    DossinO
    , et al.
    Disseminated nocardiosis caused by Nocardia abscessus in a dog. Vet Clin Pathol2010;39:3815.
  • 21.
    Siak MK
    ,
    BurrowsAK
    . A cutaneous nocardiosis in two dogs receiving ciclosporin therapy for the management of canine atopic dermatitis. Vet Dermatol2013;24:4536.
  • 22.
    Dowling S
    ,
    WebbJ
    ,
    FosterJ
    , et al.
    Opportunistic fungal infections in dogs treated with ciclosporin and glucocorticoids: eight cases. J Small Anim Pract2016;57:1059.

Footnotes

  1. Mendez Pharmacy, Austin, Texas

Copyright: © 2020 by American Animal Hospital Association 2020
<bold>FIGURE 1</bold>
FIGURE 1

Chronological report of cyclosporine dose and interleukin-2 (IL-2) messenger RNA (mRNA) expression over the course of treatment. Day 0 = First day of presentation for anemia; Black line = Dose rate of modified cyclosporine in mg/kg q 12 hr, ranging from a highest dose rate of 4.72 mg/kg q 12 hr to a lowest dose rate of 0.95 mg/kg q 12 hr; Black dotted line = Transition between cyclosporine dose rates; Red dashed line = Standard starting dose rate of modified cyclosporine of 5 mg/kg q 12 hr, as recommended in the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine consensus statement on treatment of immune-mediated hemolytic anemia 1 ; Gray bar graphs = Activated whole blood expression of patient IL-2 mRNA using a quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay as a percentage of a normal control sample (Day 40 = 0% of control, or “marked suppression” [0–5% of control], Days 93 and 124 = 55.5 and 57.2% of control, respectively, or “low suppression” [50–75% of control]); Light blue range and darker blue ranges = Laboratory recommended target ranges for IL-2 suppression of “moderate suppression” (20–50% of control) or “moderate to high suppression” (5–20% of control), respectively; and Green arrow = First day of suspected infection. Note: Marked suppression of IL-2 expression (0% of control) was detected on Day 40, at a cyclosporine dose rate (3.3 mg/kg q 12 hr) that was lower than the standard recommended starting dose rate of 5 mg/kg q 12 hr.


Contributor Notes

Correspondence: mackin@cvm.msstate.edu (A.J.M.)

ABCB1 (ATP-binding cassette sub family B member 1); IL-2 (interleukin-2); IMHA (immune-mediated hemolytic anemia); MDR1 (multidrug resistance protein 1); mRNA (messenger RNA); MSU (Mississippi State University); PCR (polymerase chain reaction); P-glycoprotein (permeability glycoprotein); PO (per os); qRT-PCR (quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction); RI (reference interval)

Accepted: 06 Nov 2019
  • Download PDF