Editorial Type: Retrospective Studies
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Mar 2020

Coxofemoral Joint Luxation in Dogs Treated with Toggle Rod Stabilization: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review with Client Survey

DVM, MS and
DVM, PhD, DACVS
Article Category: Research Article
Page Range: 83 – 91
DOI: 10.5326/JAAHA-MS-6937
Save
Download PDF

ABSTRACT

Coxofemoral luxation is the most common type of joint luxation observed clinically in dogs. This retrospective study determines the complications and outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation of coxofemoral luxations using a toggle rod stabilization in 58 dogs. The purpose of the study was to compare the results with previous studies to ascertain commonalities and differences. A majority of the canine luxations were stabilized using a 4.0 or 3.2 mm commercial toggle rod and either one or two strands of OrthoFiber, FiberWire, or monofilament nylon suture. Postoperative complications developed in 25 of the 58 (43%) dogs, with major complications in 9 cases (15.5%). The most common major complication was reluxation, which occurred in 6 dogs (10%). Five of the 6 cases of reluxation received monofilament suture, although there was not a statistically significant relationship between suture type and reluxation. Owner responses to a questionnaire reported good to excellent results for satisfaction with the procedure in 90% of cases. Results of the present study suggest that toggle rod stabilization remains an effective method for the treatment of coxofemoral joint luxation in dogs.

Introduction

Coxofemoral luxation is a common injury in the dog and makes up to 90% of all joint luxations.113 Luxations are typically associated with trauma, with ∼60% attributed to motor vehicle accidents, whereas other causes include iatrogenic, spontaneous, fights, and falls.3,4,1417 Luxations most frequently occur in a craniodorsal direction as a result of the forces generated by the trauma and the directional pull of the gluteal and iliopsoas muscles.4 A lower frequency of luxations has been described in cranioventral, caudoventral, and ventral directions.35,1720 Coxofemoral luxations can be treated with closed or open techniques. Closed reduction is usually the first line of treatment for most luxations, but the reported success rates in dogs range from 50 to 78% for craniodorsal luxations.3,2022

Open reduction and stabilization can be considered if the hip cannot be closed reduced, if postreduction reluxation occurs, or if the dog has multiple injuries and requires immediate hip stability. Numerous surgical techniques have been described to treat coxofemoral luxations.13,913,1835 Toggle rod stabilization has become an established and routine procedure performed in dogs when the underlying morphology of the femoral head and acetabulum is unaltered. Toggle rod stabilization is an effective technique as it provides a functional replacement of the round ligament of the head of the femur that aids in passive stability.5,12,18,20,28,36 It has been associated with a decreased rate of reluxation and is especially beneficial in patients with multiple orthopedic injuries.13,18,21 Variation exists with respect to the implants used for the toggle rod procedure, and different options are available for the toggle, suture, and securing button. No one system has been proved superior in a prospective clinical trial.

Outcome assessments following toggle rod stabilization of hip luxations indicate favorable results as long as reluxation does not occur. The last reported reluxation rate following toggle rod stabilization in a larger population of dogs (>60) was 11% published >10 yr ago.12 In that population, 96% of the cases received monofilament nylon suture. The objective of the current study was to retrospectively reassess the rate of reluxation in a similarly sized population in which a variety of toggle rods, suture types, and securing buttons were used to determine if novel risk factors could be identified from the past decade. Furthermore, previously determined risk factors identified by Demko et al., which resulted in diminished short-term use or elevated risk of postoperative reluxation were evaluated through medical record review.12 We hypothesized that with more collective experience and advances in implant design over the past decade, the rate of postoperative reluxation following toggle rod stabilization would be lower than previously reported values and that owner satisfaction with the technique would remain high.

Materials and Methods

Inclusion Criteria

Medical records from three private surgical practices (California Veterinary Specialists, Southern California Veterinary Surgery, and Inland Valley Veterinary Specialists) and one academic veterinary hospital (University of Missouri Veterinary Health Center) were searched to identify all dogs examined during the period from January 1, 2007, to June 30, 2017, with the diagnosis of coxofemoral joint luxation. Cases were included in the study if open reduction and toggle rod stabilization had been performed and at least 4 wk of follow-up data were available.

Procedures

Data collected from the medical records included patient signalment; body weight; history; results of initial diagnostic testing, including hematologic testing and radiographs; luxation cause and side; concurrent injuries; and if closed reduction had been attempted. Surgery-specific information obtained included surgical approach, toggle rod type and size, suture type used, and treatment of other injuries. Surgeries were performed by residents, a university residency–trained surgeon, or a board-certified surgeon. The duration of surgery was recorded and categorized as being less than or greater than 2 hr. The total anesthesia time was recorded and categorized as being less than or greater than 3 hr. The patient’s willingness to use the limb 24 hr postoperatively was recorded. Time from surgery to recheck examination was documented. Occurrence of complications was determined and categorized as either minor or major. Minor complications were considered those that resolved without the need for additional surgery (seroma, hematoma, bruising, incisional irritation, and chronic lameness). Major complications include those that required additional surgery or were perceived to potentially affect long-term outcome (surgical site infection leading to wound dehiscence, infection requiring removal of implants, and reluxation). For the purposes of this study, surgical success was defined by the following two criteria: (1) the patient not reluxating the affected hip by at least 4 wk postoperatively as determined by re-examination by a veterinarian; and (2) the patient not requiring additional surgical procedures for any major complication. The significance of those factors that Demko et al. described as being risk factors for either postoperative reluctance to bear weight or reluxation were assessed and included body weight, gender, surgery time, anesthesia time, and if multiple surgical procedures were done under a single anesthetic episode.12

Client Questionnaire

A survey of clients was completed, which was intended to identify other previously undetermined client-associated risk factors that may affect outcome as well as ascertain owner satisfaction with the procedure. Attempts were made to contact the owners of all patients by phone to request completion of an emailed questionnaire (Appendix A) in order to obtain additional information on short- and long-term outcomes, as well as overall client satisfaction. The questionnaire was modeled after one described by Zamprogno et al.37 Questions pertained to nine specific functions and four behaviors that were designed to assess the degree of function and activity level. A five-point descriptive score was used for each function/behavior, where 0 = “unable to perform the function/behavior” and 5 = “function/behavior is normal.” In addition, owners were asked to indicate the severity of lameness upon presentation, at the time of discharge, at the time of postoperative re-examination (usually between 4 and 8 wk), and at the time of questionnaire completion if the patient was still living, using a scale from 0 to 5, where 0 = “no lameness” and 5 = “non–weight-bearing lameness.” Owners were also asked to describe the degree to which they had complied with postoperative discharge instructions, including confinement and rehabilitation, where 0 = “instructions were not followed, the patient was allowed immediate normal activity, rehabilitation not performed” and 5 = “discharge instructions were strictly followed and the owner performed or sought out rehabilitation.” Postoperative complications, as perceived by the owners, were also documented and categorized as either minor or major as previously defined. Additional questionnaire information included primary use or lifestyle of the patient (family pet, sporting, show, working, or other athletic use), any medications or special diet that the pet was on, and owner overall satisfaction with the outcome of surgery.

Statistical Analysis

Results from the client questionnaire were tabulated and percentages for each of the questions were calculated. Descriptive statistics were generated using a commercially available software programa. Data were reported as mean ± standard deviation and range. A variety of statistical analyses were used to examine for the relationship between various patient- and client-associated factors and outcome. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to examine the effect of body weight, surgery time, and anesthesia time on complications including reluxation. χ2 analysis was used to determine the effect of gender, possessing multiple injuries requiring surgery, suture type (mono- versus multifilament), and weight-bearing status 24 hr postoperatively on reluxation. A Fisher exact test was used to examine the effect of duration from the time of injury to surgery on reluxation. A Spearman’s rank correlation was used to analyze the relationship in client survey answers and the occurrence of complications. Significance was set at P < .05.

Results

Patient Data

Fifty-eight cases met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Mean age of all patients was 4.8 yr (range 8 mo to 13 yr). Nine of the patients were sexually intact males, 27 were castrated males, 1 was a sexually intact female, and 21 were spayed females. Mean body weight was 23 kg (range 4.1–50.9 kg). Breeds of dogs included 12 mixed-breed dogs, 7 Labrador retrievers, 4 border collies, and 3 German shepherd dogs; the remaining patients represented a variety of breeds. Trauma was the most common cause of the coxofemoral luxation, with motor vehicular accidents representing 66% of cases. In 14 cases, the cause of the coxofemoral luxation was unknown. The time interval between luxation and presentation to the hospital was <2 days for 36% of cases, between 3 and 7 days for 50%, and >7 days for 14% of cases. The right coxofemoral joint was affected in 48% of the patients, and the left coxofemoral joint was affected in 52%. Closed reduction was attempted in 24% of the dogs prior to open reduction and toggle rod stabilization. No patient underwent previous open surgical reduction prior to presentation to the respective hospitals surveyed.

Preoperative Diagnostic Imaging

Pelvic radiographs were obtained prior to surgery in all cases. In 30 of the 58 cases (52%), abnormalities in addition to the coxofemoral joint luxation were identified. The most common concurrent pathologies noted were a variety of fractures (45%), sacroiliac joint luxation (17%), and musculoskeletal soft tissue injures (9%) including disruption of single or multiple stifle ligaments and rupture of the prepubic tendon. Of the 26 dogs with concurrent fractures, 24 dogs had fractures of the appendicular skeleton, 10 had pelvic fractures, and 4 had fractures elsewhere. Pelvic limb fractures made up 50% of the total fractures and included the ipsilateral femur (6), tibia (1), and metatarsal bones (1) as well as the contralateral femur (2), tibia (2), and tarsal bones (1). The pelvis was involved in 13 cases (50%), with the ipsilateral pelvis (9 cases; 69%) occurring more often. Osteoarthritis of the luxated hip joint or both hips, consistent with canine hip dysplasia, was observed in 10% of cases. Thoracic radiographs were performed in 44 patients. Abnormalities were seen in 4 of the 44 patients (9%) and included pulmonary contusions (2), pneumothorax (1), and diaphragmatic hernia (1). Abdominal ultrasound was performed in 11 of the 58 patients. Abnormalities were seen in 4 of the 11 patients (4%) and included abdominal wall hernia (2), ruptured urinary bladder (1), prepubic tendon rupture (1), and diaphragmatic hernia (1). Computed tomography was performed in 3 patients. Abnormalities were seen in all 3 cases and included rupture of the urinary bladder (1), ruptured kidney (1), and abdominal hernia (1).

Surgery

A craniolateral approach to the coxofemoral joint was performed in 54 of the 58 cases. The surgical approach was unknown or not reported in 4 cases. Surgical time was <2 hr in 58% of the patients and >2 hr in 42% of cases. Mean and standard deviation of the dogs included in this study was 2.18 ± 1.08 hr. Surgical procedures under the same anesthesia as the completion of the toggle rod stabilization were performed in 47% of the cases, including fracture stabilization and correction of various soft tissue injuries. Surgeries were performed by a board-certified surgeon in 31 cases (54%), a university residency–trained surgeon in 18 cases (31%), and residents in the remaining 9 (15%) cases. Other hip joint stabilization techniques were used to augment the toggle rod stabilization at the discretion of the surgeon including the placement of an antirotational suture via bone tunnels (2) and the addition of stabilizing sutures secured with either bone screw or bone anchor (3).

The type of toggle rod used was recorded in all 58 cases. Commercially available toggle rods were used in 55 of the 58 patients in this studyb. A button that is part of a commercially available system was used in the other 3 casesc. In all but 2 dogs, a single toggle rod was used in each coxofemoral joint. In two cases, a second toggle rod was placed after the first one was lost as a result of breakage or slippage of the suture. Of the 55 cases that received a toggle rod, 4.0, 3.2, and 2.7 mm rods were used in 28, 24, and 3 cases, respectively. Suture material used for the toggle rod stabilization procedure was monofilament nylon, #5 OrthoFiberd, and polyblend FiberWiree, in 66, 22, and 12% of cases, respectively. Among patients receiving monofilament nylon suture, 80 lb suture was used in 47%, 60 lb suture was used in 18%, and 40 lb suture was used in 34%. Various techniques were used to secure the suture lateral to the femoral bone tunnel. A polypropylene suture button was used most commonly (48), whereas other techniques included TightRopef system buttons (5), titanium suture buttons (4), and an Ormrodg button in 1 case. Immediate postoperative radiographs confirmed appropriate reduction in all cases.

Outcome

In 47 patients, a follow-up examination was performed at one of the participating hospitals, whereas in the remaining cases, recheck examinations were performed by the referring veterinarian. All cases had at least one follow-up examination performed between 4 and 8 wk after surgery at which time complications, if present, were recorded. During this time, postoperative complications were observed in 25 (43%) of the patients with nine different conditions observed and 5 cases having both minor and major complications occurring together. Complications were associated with reluxation in the present study (P < .001). Sixteen (28%) patients developed minor complications, which did not require additional surgery, and included primarily incisional issues (superficial irritation [6], seroma [5], partial dehiscence as a result of a skin suture or staple [4], and hematoma [1]). Muscle atrophy and chronic lameness was reported in one case each and concomitant with another minor complication. Two of the 16 patients with reported minor complications were diagnosed with subluxation of the operated hip diagnosed by an increase in joint space on radiography, neither of which required additional surgery. Radiography reports for these patients did not describe any signs indicating progression of osteoarthritis or evidence of tunnel widening. Major complications were reported in nine cases (15%). The most common major complication was reluxation, which occurred in 6 of the 58 patients (10%). One of the remaining three cases developed chronic lameness of the limb attributed to subluxation of the coxofemoral joint and required a femoral head and neck ostectomy. An additional case required further surgery on the contralateral tibia fracture that likely placed strain on the coxofemoral luxation hip, leading to subluxation and lameness; the third case required additional surgery to remove the suture as a result of a late, deep infection. Of the 6 patients with reluxation, none had radiographic evidence of underlying hip dysplasia. The cause of reluxation was attributed to failure of the suture in 5 patients and could not be determined in the remaining case. No reluxation in any patient occurred as a result of toggle rod failure. In 5 of the patients with reluxation, monofilament suture had been used and was recorded as having broken. FiberWire was used in the remaining reluxation case; however, the mode of failure was not recorded. Time from surgery to reluxation was between 2 and 8 wk in 5 of the patients, whereas in the remaining case, time to reluxation was not recorded. Five of the 6 patients with reluxation were bearing weight on the affected limb at the time of discharge.

Duration of luxation prior to surgical stabilization was not significantly related to reluxation (P = 1.0). Neither the existence of multiple injuries (P = 1.0) nor the performance of multiple surgical procedures under the same anesthetic episode were related to reluxation (P = .8). Patients whose surgery time was <2 hr were not significantly less likely to have a reluxation than those whose surgery time was >2 hr (P = 1.0). The weight-bearing status of the patient postoperatively was not significantly related to reluxation (P = .17). Neither owner compliance to discharge instructions nor any previous illness or injury were associated with reluxation (P = 1.0). It was noted that dogs for whom surgery times were ≤2 hr were less likely to bear weight on the affected limb 24 hr after surgery than those dogs for whom the surgery time was >2 hr, although no significance was noted (P = .16). The type of suture used (mono- versus multifilament) was not related to reluxation (P = .3).

Client Questionnaire

Client questionnaires were returned by 49 of the 58 patients (85%), with the time from surgery to completion of the questionnaire ranging from 6 mo to 11 yr. Mean score for severity of lameness at the time of discharge (0 = “no lameness” and 5 = “non–weight-bearing lame”) was 2.9, and mean score for degree to which owners complied with recommendations for postoperative confinement and rehabilitation (0 = “none” and 5 = “complete”) was 4.36. Postoperative complications were reported by 24 of the 49 (46%) respondents, with pain being the most commonly reported complication (17%), followed by reluxation (10%), dehiscence (6%), seroma (4%), infection (4%), complications involving an unrelated surgery completed at the time of the toggle rod procedure (2%), and chronic lameness (2%). When asked to rate limb function at the time of first recheck (0 = “no lameness” and 5 = “non–weight-bearing lame”), 44 of the 49 (90%) indicated a score of 0 or 1, and the remaining 9 indicated an average score of 2.7. When asked to rate current limb function (0 = “no lameness” and 5 = “non–weight-bearing lame”), 43 of the 49 (88%) indicated a score of 0 or 1, and 1 respondent indicated a score of 5. The remaining 4 owners reported an average score of 3.5. A complete breakdown of the more relevant questions is provided in Table 1.

TABLE 1 The Distribution of the More Informative Questions from the Client Questionnaire

            TABLE 1

When owners were asked if they were satisfied with the outcome of the surgical procedure (0 = “agree” and 5 = “disagree”), 43 of the 49 (88%) owners provided a score of 1 or less (“good” to “excellent agreement”), 1 owner (2%) provided a score of 2 (“fair agreement”), 2 owners (4%) reported a score of 2–3 (“fair to poor agreement”), and 3 owners (6%) provided a score of 3 (“poor agreement”). Three of the 5 owners who provided a score of “fair to poor agreement” or “poor agreement” with respect to their satisfaction with the procedure had patients in whom reluxation had occurred. It was determined that the more serious the complications experienced by the patient, the lower the owner satisfaction (Rs = –0.48, P < .01). Conversely, the higher the limb function as judged by the owners, the higher their satisfaction (Rs = 0.45, P < .02).

Discussion

Results of the present study demonstrate that toggle rod stabilization can be an effective treatment for dogs diagnosed with a coxofemoral luxation with high owner satisfaction.12,18,2022,35,38 The major complication rate was 15.5% with a reluxation rate of 10%. Motor vehicle trauma was the single most frequent cause of joint luxation in the present study, as was the case in previous studies.12,20,31,32 Thirty-three of 56 (59%) patients had additional injuries visible on pelvic radiographs obtained prior to surgery, and 15 of 42 (36%) patients had thoracic radiographic abnormalities, thus emphasizing the importance of performing a complete physical, orthopedic, and neurologic examination on dogs presenting with hip luxations. Further, complete radiographic evaluation of patients often reveals occult injuries that may not be diagnosed on examination alone and should be considered in every case.

The success rate in the present study was comparable to success rates previously reported for dogs.1,8,9,1225 The most common major complication in the present study was reluxation, which occurred in 10% of dogs. The majority of reluxations (four of six cases) occurred within the first 2 wk after surgery. The rate of reluxation was comparable to that reported by Demko et al. (11%).12 The fact that reluxation most commonly occurs in the early postoperative period is not surprising as the stability of the repair depends primarily on the implants during this period. In dogs with polytrauma, injuries to other limbs may necessitate early excessive weight bearing, leading to reluxation, and four of six (67%) dogs in the present study with reluxation possessed concurrent injuries, although this association did not achieve statistical significance. A potential advantage of toggle rod stabilization compared with other stabilization techniques is that it allows an early return of joint function, thus preserving joint range of motion and cartilage health.12 However, caution is needed in the initial week after surgery to avoid reluxation.12

Although no set standard was put into place at the institutions in our study, the authors’ recommendations were to keep the patient kennel or crate confined for a minimum of 2 wk, followed by gradual increase in short leash walks over the following 2–4 wk. Passive range of motion exercises, if tolerated, were started after 3–4 days and extended to active range of motion after the 2 wk recheck visit. Full activity, including hydrotherapy, would be allowed after the 6 or 8 wk postoperative recheck visit.

With five dogs in the present study, reluxation was attributed to failure of the suture material. Although size of the suture material in the dogs seemed subjectively appropriate given their body weights as noted in previous studies,12,20,35,3742 suture breakage still occurred likely as a result of mechanical overload. Further studies are indicated to determine if overload is common or if other possible conditions such as tunnel widening, tunnel abrasion on suture, or loosening at the site of the button may be more prevalent. Five of the six dogs (83%) who experienced reluxation were repaired with nylon monofilament versus polyethylene multifilament suture, although the relationship between monofilament nylon and reluxation did not achieve statistical significance. However, this apparent lack of statistical correlation should be interpreted with caution as a result of the population size relative to the reluxation rate. No randomized, prospective clinical trial has been completed comparing the reluxation rate with use of different suture types. However, previous studies have documented that, in general, polyethylene multifilament sutures (FiberWire and OrthoFiber) are stronger, stiffer, and elongate less than nylon monofilament suture.42 Recently, an in vitro biomechanical model examining various combinations of suture material and toggle types concluded that braided suture materials outperformed other types of suture used but simultaneously demonstrated that monofilament nylon was capable of withstanding loads within the physiologic range of the round ligament of the femur.41 Subsequently, a case series has described the use of multifilament suture (TightRope FiberTape) to perform toggle procedures in 17 dogs with 0% reluxation at 4 wk after surgery and a 5.8% reluxation rate long term, which seemingly argues for the superiority of multifilament suture for toggle rod application.42 Although our results may appear to support the use of monofilament for the use in toggle rod constructs, this remains to be definitively proved. Appropriately sized monofilament nylon should match the physiologic needs to maintain hip reduction with a high success rate. However, if greater mechanical strength is required owing to patient and client factors, a multifilament suture may prove superior and necessary to reduce the risk of reluxation.

In six dogs in the present study (10%), various hip joint stabilization techniques were used to complement the toggle rod stabilization, including the use of bone anchors and screws with extracapsular and derotational sutures. Despite this, reluxation occurred in one of these six dogs. Although it is not known whether reluxation would have occurred in the other five dogs had these additional stabilization measures not been used, it has been discussed by others that augmentation of the toggle rod procedure may be beneficial in some cases.710,12,1821,32

In the present study, dogs for whom surgery time was ≥2 hr were not any more prone to have reluxation occur than were dogs for whom surgery time was <2 hr. Dogs who required multiple surgeries had longer surgery and anesthesia times in general. Additional orthopedic injuries affecting other limbs can lead to increased weight bearing on the stabilized hip joint in the immediate postoperative period, when reluxation is more likely to occur. However, polytrauma, surgery time, and total anesthesia time were not significantly associated with risk of reluxation in this study. Prolonged surgical time can also result from difficulty in reducing the hip joint or experiencing complications when placing the toggle rod and/or suture. Interestingly, dogs for whom surgery time was ≤2 hr were less likely to bear weight on the affected limb 24 hr after surgery than those dogs whose surgery time was >2 hr. It was noted in the present study that weight-bearing status immediately after surgery and at the time of discharge was not associated with reluxation rate. Although all dogs received analgesics postoperatively, an increase in cases with higher morbidity may have been associated with longer procedure times as a result of multiple injuries sustained by those patients.

Infection was encountered in a total of five cases; four were associated with superficial dermal infections that responded with antibiotics and an Elizabethan collar. One case involved a late infection following the initial surgical procedure that was reported 8 mo postoperatively. The patient developed a deep infection of the surgery site that required surgical intervention with a femoral head and neck ostectomy and removal of the suture and polypropylene button. Because of the low number of reported cases of infection, a significance could not be determined. However, the only case that required removal of the suture implant used multifilament (FiberWire) suture.

In the current study, owner satisfaction with the outcome of the procedure was positive and the majority would have the surgery performed again. Not surprisingly, owners who were less satisfied were those whose dogs suffered major complications including reluxation. Still, 44 of the 49 (90%) owners reporting between 6 mo and 11 yr after surgery provided a score of 0 or 1 (“good to excellent recovery, owner completely satisfied”), suggesting high overall satisfaction with the procedure. Furthermore, when asked to rate current limb function in those dogs still living, 23 of the 27 (85%) owners answering that question indicated a score of 0 or 1, suggesting that most dogs had no or only negligible lameness at a minimum of 6 months after surgery. One of the dogs was reported to be a hunting dog whose owner indicated that the dog did not have any lameness, and another was a working/herding dog that reportedly was able to return to full work. Only six dogs were reported to be receiving medications for treatment of osteoarthritis at the time of survey completion. However, because long-term follow-up examination and radiography was not performed, the relationship between osteoarthritis-related pain requiring treatment and the specific previous diagnosis of hip dysplasia could not be established.

Limitations of the current study include its retrospective nature and the reliance on the completeness of medical records. Some follow-up examinations were performed by referring veterinarians, and some complications may not have been reported. Further, reluxation rate was only definitely examined by 4 wk after surgery. Whereas most reluxations reportedly occur during this early postoperative period, it is possible that some reluxations occurred months later and went undocumented.12 Related, long-term outcome was based on owner assessments only, which are limited and subjective.43 Statistical analysis of factors associated with reluxation was limited by the relatively small population size that met the inclusion criteria and the low incidence of reluxation. The concern of owner recall bias is an additional factor that could have affected the data, especially up to 11 yr after surgery. The subjective nature of owner assessment regarding how well their pet is able to ambulate can be argued as it has been objectively determined that even a patient with a luxated hip can sometimes be surprisingly ambulatory on it. It has been noted in a study of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy patients, owner questionnaire findings revealed a 98% satisfaction, although an objective outcome did not reveal that high of an outcome.44 An additional limitation would also include the potential immediate and long-term effects of drilling into the femoral head and neck and its potential risk of developing osteoarthritis. Thus, despite not finding statistically significant relationships affecting reluxation, the surgeon is advised to consider all patient and client factors prior to selecting surgical technique and implant type.

Conclusion

The toggle rod procedure remains an effective surgical technique to treat coxofemoral hip luxations. However, we rejected our hypothesis in finding that despite novel implant designs over the last decade, the risk of reluxation remains about 10% when considering a population in which a variety of different techniques are used. The most common mode of failure in this population was suture breakage, reinforcing the need for future investigations to continue to focus on the impact of suture selection to potentially attenuate reluxation rate and improve upon the technique.

The authors would like to thank Dr. Richard Madsen, PhD, for his statistical contribution.

APPENDIX A

Client Questionnaire

  • 1) Had your pet been diagnosed with any other problems in addition to his/her orthopedic injury? no or yes, if yes please list:

  • 2) If you can, please list any medications that your pet was receiving prior to the injury and what medications they were sent home on:

  • 3) How would you describe the degree that you complied with the postoperative discharge instructions, including confinement and rehabilitation? Scored on a 0–5 scale (0 = none, let patient do whatever it wanted; 1 = some confinement but no rehabilitation; 2 = complete confinement but no rehabilitation; 3 = complete confinement and some rehabilitation — used sling and passive range of motion or hydrotherapy; 4 = complete confinement, sling walks, some passive range of motion but no hydrotherapy; 5 = complete confinement, sling walks, and rehabilitation [either with therapist or on own]).

  • 4) Please describe the severity of your pet’s lameness at the time of discharge. Scored on a 0–5 scale (0 = normal gait, 1 = mild weight-bearing lameness, 2 = moderate weight-bearing lameness, 3 = severe weight-bearing lameness, 4 = severe intermittent weight-bearing lameness, 5 = severe continuous non–weight-bearing lameness).

  • 5) Please describe the severity of your pet’s lameness at the time of their recheck (6–12 wk). Scored on a 0–5 scale (0 = normal gait, 1 = mild weight-bearing lameness, 2 = moderate weight-bearing lameness, 3 = severe weight-bearing lameness, 4 = severe intermittent weight-bearing lameness, 5 = severe continuous non–weight-bearing lameness).

  • 6) Please describe the severity of your pet’s lameness at the present time. Scored on a 0–5 scale (0 = normal gait, 1 = mild weight-bearing lameness, 2 = moderate weight-bearing lameness, 3 = severe weight-bearing lameness, 4 = severe intermittent weight-bearing lameness, 5 = severe continuous non–weight-bearing lameness).

  • 7) What is your pet’s current limb function compared with the function prior to the injury?

    •  Rising from a resting position

    •  Stiffness

    •  Ability to stretch

    •  Walking

    •  Running

    •  Climbing stairs

    •  Descend stairs

    •  Ability to jump up

    •  Ability to jump down

    •  Chasing objects

    •  Playing with toys

    •  Playing with other pets

    •  Resentment to handling

5 point descriptive scale: 1 = unable, 2 = often interferes, 3 = sometimes interferes, 4 = hardly ever interferes, or 5 = normal.

  • 8) What is the primary use of the patient? (e.g., family pet, sporting dog, show dog, working dog, or athletic use)

  • 9) Did you pet develop any of the following complications during the recovery period?

    •  Seroma

    •  Fever

    •  Infection

    •  Sciatic nerve damage

    •  Wound dehiscence (opening up of the incision site)

    •  Chronic lameness

    •  Reluxation

  • 10) What is your overall satisfaction with the outcome of surgery?

    •  a) 0 = excellent (no lameness)

    •  b) 1 = good (occasional stiffness)

    •  c) 2 = fair (regular lameness)

    •  d) 3 = poor (always lame)

REFERENCES

  • 1.
    Fry PD
    . Observations on the surgical treatment of hip dislocation in the dog and cat. J Small Anim Pract1974;15:66170.
  • 2.
    Johnson JA
    ,
    AustinC
    ,
    BruerGJ
    . Incidence of canine appendicular skeletal disorders in 16 veterinary teaching hospitals from 1980–1989. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol1994:7:5669.
  • 3.
    Trostel CT
    ,
    PeckJN
    ,
    deHaanJJ
    . Spontaneous bilateral coxofemoral luxation in four dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc2000:36:35662.
  • 4.
    Basher AWP
    ,
    WalterMC
    ,
    NewtonCD
    . Traumatic coxofemoral luxation in the dog and cat. Vet Surg1986;15:35662.
  • 5.
    Duff SRI
    ,
    BennetD
    . Hip luxation in small animals: an evaluation of some methods of treatment. Vet Rec1982;111:1403.
  • 6.
    Beale BS
    ,
    LewisDD
    ,
    ParkerRB
    , et al.
    Ischio-ilial pinning for stabilization of coxofemoral luxations in twenty-one dogs: a retrospective evaluation. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol1991;7:5669.
  • 7.
    DeCamp CE
    ,
    JohnstonSA
    ,
    DejardinLM
    , et al.
    The hip joint. In:
    BrinkerWO
    ,
    PiermatteiDL
    ,
    FloGL
    , eds. Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair.
    5th ed.
    Philadelphia
    :
    Elsevier
    , 2016;468517.
  • 8.
    Fox SM
    . Coxofemoral luxations in dogs. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet1991;13:3818.
  • 9.
    McLaughlin RM
    . Traumatic joint luxations in small animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract1995;25:117596.
  • 10.
    Bebchuk TN
    . Recognizing and treating joint luxations. Vet Med2000;12:92633.
  • 11.
    Martinez SA
    ,
    CoronadoGS
    . Acquired conditions that lead to osteoarthritis in the dog. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract1997; 27:75975.
  • 12.
    Demko JL
    ,
    SidawayBK
    ,
    ThiemanKM
    , et al.
    Toggle rod stabilization for treatment of hip joint luxation in dogs: 62 cases (2000–2005). J Am Vet Med Assoc2006;229:9849.
  • 13.
    Scott HM
    ,
    McLaughlinRM
    . Coxofemoral joint. In: Feline Orthopedics.
    London
    :
    Manson Publishing
    ; 2007:18491.
  • 14.
    Pettit GD
    . Coxofemoral luxation. Vet Clin North Am1971;1:50322.
  • 15.
    Robinson GW
    . Left caudoventral luxation. J Am Vet Med Assoc1967;151:3535.
  • 16.
    Campbell JR
    ,
    LawsonDD
    ,
    WyburnRS
    . Coxofemoral luxation in the dog. Vet Rec1965;77:11737.
  • 17.
    Hammer DL
    . Recurrent coxofemoral luxation in fifteen dogs and one cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc1980;177:101820.
  • 18.
    Bone DL
    ,
    WalkerM
    ,
    CantwellHD
    . Traumatic coxofemoral luxations in dogs, results of repair. Vet Surg1984;13:26370.
  • 19.
    Rochat MC
    . Managing coxofemoral luxation in dogs. Vet Med2001;5:38590.
  • 20.
    Evers P
    ,
    JohnsonGR
    ,
    WallaceLJ
    , et al.
    Long-term treatment of traumatic coxofemoral joint dislocation in dogs: 64 cases (1973–1992). J Am Vet Med Assoc1997;210:5964.
  • 21.
    Martini FM
    ,
    SimonazziB
    ,
    Del BueM
    . Extra-articular absorbable suture stabilization of coxofemoral luxation in dogs. Vet Surg2001;30:46875.
  • 22.
    Pozzi A
    ,
    KowaleskiMP
    ,
    DyceJ
    , et al.
    Treatment of traumatic coxofemoral luxation by cemented total hip arthroplasty. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol2004;17:198203.
  • 23.
    Lawson DD
    . Toggle fixation for recurrent dislocation of the hip in the dog. J Small Anim Pract1964;6:579.
  • 24.
    Haburjak JJ
    ,
    LenehanTM
    ,
    HarariJ
    , et al.
    Treatment of traumatic coxofemoral luxation with triple pelvic osteotomy in 19 dogs (1987–1999). Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol2001;14:6977.
  • 25.
    Kilic E
    ,
    OsaydinI
    ,
    AtalanG
    , et al.
    Transposition of the sacrotuberous ligament for the treatment of coxofemoral luxation in dogs. J Small Anim Pract2002;43:3414.
  • 26.
    McLaughlin RM
    ,
    TillsonDM
    . Flexible fixation for craniodorsal coxofemoral luxations in dogs. Vet Surg1994;23:2130.
  • 27.
    Shani J
    ,
    JohnstonDE
    ,
    ShaharR
    . Stabilization of traumatic coxofemoral luxation with an extra-capsular suture from the greater trochanter to the origin of the rectus femoris. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol2004;17:126.
  • 28.
    Beckham HP
    ,
    SmithMM
    ,
    KernDA
    . Use of modified toggle pin repair of coxofemoral luxation in dogs with multiple orthopedic injuries: 14 cases (1986–1994). J Am Vet Med Assoc1996;208:814.
  • 29.
    Rochereau P
    ,
    BernardeA
    . Stabilisation of coxofemoral luxation using tenodesis of the deep gluteal muscle. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol2012;25:4953.
  • 30.
    Ozaydin I
    ,
    KilicE
    ,
    BaranV
    , et al.
    Reduction and stabilization of hip luxation by transposition of the ligament sacrotuberale in dogs: an in vivo study. Vet Surg2003;32:4651.
  • 31.
    Cetinkaya MA
    ,
    OlcayB
    . Modified Knowles toggle pin technique with nylon monofilament suture material for treatment of two caudoventral hip luxation cases. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol2010;23:1148.
  • 32.
    Venturini A
    ,
    PinnaS
    ,
    TamburroR
    . Combined intra-extra-articular technique for stabilisation of coxofemoral laxation. Preliminary results in two dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol2010;23:1825.
  • 33.
    Bennet D
    ,
    DuffSR
    . Transarticular pinning as a treatment for hip luxation in the dog and cat. J Small Anim Pract1980:21:3739.
  • 34.
    Seissner TR
    ,
    WhitlockRG
    ,
    Langley-HobbsSJ
    . Long-term results of transarticular pinning for surgical stabilisation of coxofemoral luxation in 20 cats. J Small Anim Pract2009;50:1127.
  • 35.
    Ash K
    ,
    RosselliD
    ,
    DanielskiA
    , et al.
    Correction of craniodorsal coxofemoral luxation in cats and small breed dogs using a modified Knowles technique with the braided polyblend TightRope systems. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol2012;25:5460.
  • 36.
    Flynn MF
    ,
    EdminstonDN
    ,
    RoeSC
    , et al.
    Biomechanical evaluation of a toggle pin technique for management of coxofemoral luxation. Vet Surg1994;23:31121.
  • 37.
    Zamprogno H
    ,
    HansenBD
    ,
    BondellHD
    , et al.
    Item generation and design testing of a questionnaire to assess degenerative joint disease-associated pain in cats. Am J Vet Res2010;71:141724.
  • 38.
    Kieves NR
    ,
    LotiskasPJ
    ,
    SchulzKS
    , et al.
    Hip toggle stabilization using the TightRope system in 17 dogs: technique and long-term outcome. Vet Surg2014;43:51522.
  • 39.
    Baltzer WI
    ,
    SchulzKS
    ,
    StoverSM
    , et al.
    Biomechanical analysis of suture anchors and suture materials used for toggle pin stabilization of hip joint luxation in dogs. Am J Vet Res2001;62:7218.
  • 40.
    Spranklin DB
    ,
    ElderSE
    ,
    BoyleCR
    , et al.
    Comparison of a suture anchor and a toggle rod for use in toggle pin fixation of coxofemoral luxation. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc2006;42:1216.
  • 41.
    Jha S
    ,
    KowaleskiMP
    . Mechanical analysis of twelve toggle constructs for stabilization of coxofemoral luxations. Vet Surg2012;41:948-953.
  • 42.
    Burgess RCF
    ,
    ElderSE
    ,
    McLaughlinRM
    , et al.
    In vitro biomechanics evaluation and comparison of FiberWire, FiberTape, OrthoFiber, and nylon leader line for potential use during extraarticular stabilization of canine cruciate deficient stifles. Vet Surg2010;39:20815.
  • 43.
    Burton NJ
    ,
    OwenMR
    ,
    ColborneGR
    . Can owners and clinicians assess outcome in dogs with fragmented medial coronoid process?Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol2009; 22:1839.
  • 44.
    Hart JL
    ,
    MayKD
    ,
    KievesNR
    , et al.
    Comparison of owner satisfaction between stifle joint orthoses and tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for the management of cranial cruciate ligament disease in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc2016; 249:3918.

Footnotes

  1. SAS V9; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina

  2. Imex Veterinary Inc., Longview, Texas

  3. Arthrex Veterinary Systems, Arthrex Inc., Naples, Florida

  4. Securos Veterinary Orthopedics, Inc., Fiskdale, Massachusetts

  5. Arthrex Veterinary Systems, Arthrex Inc., Naples, Florida

  6. Arthrex Veterinary Systems, Arthrex Inc., Naples, Florida

  7. Veterinary Instrumentation Ltd., Sheffield, United Kingdom

Copyright: © 2020 by American Animal Hospital Association 2020

Contributor Notes

Correspondence: ttrosteldvm@gmail.com (C.T.T.)
Accepted: 19 Jul 2019
  • Download PDF