Editorial Type: Online Case Reports
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Jan 2019

Caudal Mediastinal Fish Hook Foreign Body with Pulmonary Artery Penetration in Two Dogs

DVM and
DVM, DECVS, DACVS-SA, PhD
Article Category: Case Report
Page Range: e551-01
DOI: 10.5326/JAAHA-MS-6787
Save
Download PDF

ABSTRACT

A 1.5 yr old spayed female mixed-breed dog and a 3 yr old spayed female Labrador retriever were evaluated for suspected esophageal fishhook foreign bodies. Radiographs yielded fishhook foreign bodies present caudal to the cardiac silhouette. Endoscopic retrieval for suspected caudal esophageal foreign body was attempted and aborted due to inadequate visualization of the entire fishhooks within the lumen of the esophagus. At surgery, the fishhooks were seen within the caudal mediastinum, and were engaging the left caudal pulmonary artery. Manual fishhook extraction was performed successfully with minimal hemorrhage. Fishhook foreign bodies caudal to the cardiac silhouette may have vascular involvement. Clinicians should exercise caution when attempting endoscopic retrieval of fishhooks in this location.

Introduction

Esophageal foreign bodies are common emergency presentations and have been reported in marine animals, people, and dogs.17 In the veterinary literature, ingested bones, sticks, and sewing needles are the most commonly reported esophageal foreign bodies.8 Both endoscopic and surgical techniques have been described for retrieval of esophageal fishhooks; however, both postendoscopic and postsurgical management of esophageal foreign bodies can lead to major vascular trauma, including esophageal-aortic fistulas and traumatic avulsion of the dorsal vertebral arteries.6,9,10 Life-threatening vascular involvement is rare, but sudden death following endoscopic esophageal fishhook extraction has been reported and was attributed to pulmonary vein involvement.5 This case report describes the presentation, medical management, surgical management, and postoperative recovery of two dogs with suspected esophageal fishhook foreign bodies in which a pulmonary artery was involved.

Case Report

Case 1

A 1.5 yr old spayed female mixed-breed dog was presented to the Randall B. Terry, Jr. Companion Animal Veterinary Medical Center at North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine for a suspected esophageal fishhook foreign body. Prior to presentation, the dog ingested a fishing line. Excess fishing line was cut, and the dog was sent for immediate medical attention. Radiographs at a local emergency clinic revealed a single barbed fishhook foreign body caudal to the cardiac silhouette. The hook measured 4.5 × 1.7 cm. The fishhook was positioned so that the curved portion was cranial within the caudal mediastinum and the eye of the hook and barb were pointing caudally. The barbed point was facing rightward and dorsal on thoracic radiographs, but the entirety of the hook was within the left side of the thorax on the ventrodorsal projection. Upon arrival to the referral hospital, general physical examination was within normal limits. Presurgical serum chemistries and complete blood count were within normal limits. A three-view thoracic radiographic study was performed to assess the current location of the foreign body, which appeared unchanged from the radiographic study performed 4 hr earlier by the referring veterinarian (Figure 1). Mild pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum were noted on both sets of radiographs, consistent with esophageal perforation.

FIGURE 1. Ventrodorsal (A) and lateral (B) thoracic radiographic projections of Case 1 at presentation to the Randall B. Terry, Jr. Companion Animal Veterinary Medical Center at North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine. Note the location of the metal foreign bodies (fishhook and leader) present in the caudal mediastinum, caudal to the heart base and cranial to the diaphragm. Mild pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax are identified, consistent with esophageal perforation by the fishhook. The remainder of the thorax is unremarkable.FIGURE 1. Ventrodorsal (A) and lateral (B) thoracic radiographic projections of Case 1 at presentation to the Randall B. Terry, Jr. Companion Animal Veterinary Medical Center at North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine. Note the location of the metal foreign bodies (fishhook and leader) present in the caudal mediastinum, caudal to the heart base and cranial to the diaphragm. Mild pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax are identified, consistent with esophageal perforation by the fishhook. The remainder of the thorax is unremarkable.FIGURE 1. Ventrodorsal (A) and lateral (B) thoracic radiographic projections of Case 1 at presentation to the Randall B. Terry, Jr. Companion Animal Veterinary Medical Center at North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine. Note the location of the metal foreign bodies (fishhook and leader) present in the caudal mediastinum, caudal to the heart base and cranial to the diaphragm. Mild pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax are identified, consistent with esophageal perforation by the fishhook. The remainder of the thorax is unremarkable.
FIGURE 1 Ventrodorsal (A) and lateral (B) thoracic radiographic projections of Case 1 at presentation to the Randall B. Terry, Jr. Companion Animal Veterinary Medical Center at North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine. Note the location of the metal foreign bodies (fishhook and leader) present in the caudal mediastinum, caudal to the heart base and cranial to the diaphragm. Mild pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax are identified, consistent with esophageal perforation by the fishhook. The remainder of the thorax is unremarkable.

Citation: Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 55, 1; 10.5326/JAAHA-MS-6787

The patient was premedicated with intravenous fentanyla and anesthetized with propofolb. Preendoscopic antibiotics were not administered. The dog was endotracheally intubated and anesthesia was maintained with isofluranec in 100% oxygen. Mechanical ventilation was used intermittently during both endoscopy and surgery at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. A continuous rate infusion of fentanyla was continued during the perioperative period for pain control. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopyd was performed; however, due to the proximity of the fishhook to the lower esophageal sphincter, and the inability to visualize the entirety of the hook (only the eyelet of the hook and attached fishing line were visible within the lumen of the esophagus), endoscopy was aborted. In preparation for surgery, cefazoline was administered (22 mg/g IV) and redosed once every 90 min perioperatively.

The dog was placed in right lateral recumbency, and a standard surgical preparation was performed using standard surgical scrubf. Based on the leftward positioning of the barb of the fishhook on the radiographs and endoscopic visualization of the fishing line exiting the left esophageal wall, a left eighth intercostal thoracotomy was performed. The eighth intercostal space was selected based on the craniocaudal position of the fishhook. Following gentle cranial retraction of the left caudal lung lobe, the fishhook was palpated exiting the esophagus ∼1 cm cranial to the diaphragm within the caudal mediastinum. A small volume of hemorrhagic fluid was released upon incision into the mediastinum overlying the fishhook. The hook was visualized to be exiting the esophagus and penetrating the left caudal pulmonary artery. The hook was held immobile using two needle drivers while the center was cut using pin cutters. This maneuver allowed the straight portion of the fishhook with the incorporated eyelet and fishing line to fall into the esophageal lumen for endoscopic retrieval following surgery. The esophageal wall was inspected, and no defects large enough to warrant closure could be identified; therefore, no sutures were placed over the area of perforation. The barbed end was gently released. A Satinsky clamp was placed tangentially across the pulmonary artery, ensuring both continuing vessel patency and hemostasis, and the hook was gently extracted from the artery and removed. The resulting defect in the pulmonary artery was over-sewn using 5-0 polypropyleneg in a simple continuous pattern. The Satinsky clamp was slowly released, and minor hemorrhaging was noted. The clamp was replaced, and an additional simple interrupted suture was placed at the site of hemorrhage using 5-0 polypropylene. The clamp was again released, and no further hemorrhage was noted. Following placement of a 14-French chest tubeh, the thoracotomy was closed routinely. Endoscopic retrieval of the remainder of the fishhook was uneventful, and the dog recovered in the intensive care unit uneventfully. The chest tube remained in place for 18 hr postoperatively to monitor for hemorrhage and pneumothorax, and the dog was discharged from the hospital 36 hr later with a transdermal fentanyl patchi (25 µg) and carprofenj (2.2 mg/kg per os [PO] q 12 hr). At the 2 wk suture removal appointment, physical examination was unremarkable, and the dog was returned to normal activity.

Case 2

A 3 yr old spayed female Labrador retriever was presented to the Randall B. Terry, Jr. Companion Animal Veterinary Medical Center at North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine for a suspected esophageal fishhook foreign body. The owner initially witnessed the dog pawing at the face while on a walk, then found fishing line extending from the mouth. The line was cut, and the dog taken to a local emergency clinic, where radiographs revealed a single barb fishhook caudal to the cardiac silhouette. The hook measured 4.5 × 1.7 cm. The hook was positioned so that the curved portion was positioned cranially, and the eye of the hook and barb were positioned caudally within the caudal mediastinum. The barbed end was facing slightly leftward and ventral on thoracic radiographs. No pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax was noted. On presentation to the referral hospital, general physical examination was within normal limits. Presurgical serum chemistries and complete blood count were within normal limits. A three-view thoracic radiographic study was performed to assess the current location of the foreign body, which appeared unchanged from the radiographic study performed 6 hr before by the referring veterinarian.

The dog was premedicated with intravenous hydromorphonek and anesthetized with propofolb. The dog was endotracheally intubated and anesthesia was maintained with isofluranec in 100% oxygen. Mechanical ventilation was used intermittently during both endoscopy and surgery at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. A continuous rate infusion of fentanyla was used in the perioperative period for pain control. Based on the location of the fishhook on the radiographs and history of swallowing the fishhook prior to presentation, endoscopyd was performed to confirm the location of the fishhook within the esophagus and attempt extraction. The fishing line could be seen exiting the esophageal mucosa, but the fishhook could not be visualized endoscopically, so extraction of the fishhook was not attempted. Due to the inability to visualize the fishhook within the esophageal lumen, and based on its radiographic location towards the left side of the mediastinum, the dog underwent a left eighth intercostal space thoracotomy following routine surgical preparation using standard surgical scrubf. Cefazoline was administered (22 mg/g IV) and redosed once every 90 min perioperatively. The eighth intercostal space was chosen based on the craniocaudal position of the fishhook on the radiographs. After gentle cranial traction of the left caudal lung lobe, the fishhook was palpated within the mediastinum caudal to the heart and ∼1 cm cranial to the diaphragm. The mediastinum was incised over the fishhook, and the hook was visualized to be partially embedded within the left caudal pulmonary artery. The entire fishhook was within the caudal mediastinum, and the fishing line could be seen penetrating the esophagus. The hook was held immobile using two needle drivers while the center was cut using pin cutters. This maneuver allowed the straight portion of the fishhook with the incorporated eyelet to be removed without pulling the eyelet or the barb through the wall of the pulmonary artery. The fishing line was cut and allowed to fall into the esophageal lumen for endoscopic retrieval following surgery. The esophageal wall was inspected, and no defects large enough to warrant closure were noted; therefore, no sutures were placed over the area of perforation. The barbed end was gently released. A purse string suture using 5-0 polypropyleneg was placed in the pulmonary artery around the fishhook. The fishhook was gently extracted from the pulmonary artery and the purse string tightened to close the resultant defect in the arterial wall. Minor hemorrhaging was noted during extraction of the fishhook, but not following tightening of the purse string suture, and no additional sutures were necessary. Following placement of a 14-French chest tubeh, the thoracotomy was closed routinely. Endoscopic retrieval of the fishing line was successful, and the dog recovered uneventfully in the intensive care unit. The chest tube remained in place for 24 hr postoperatively to monitor for hemorrhage and pneumothorax. The dog was discharged from the hospital 48 hr later with a transdermal fentanyl patchi (50 µg), carprofenj (2.2 mg/kg PO q 12 hr), tramadoll (3 mg/kg PO q 8–12 hr), and omeprazolem (1.2 mg/kg PO q 24 hr). At the 2 wk suture removal appointment, physical examination was unremarkable, and the dog was returned to normal activity.

Discussion

Although esophageal foreign bodies, including fishhooks, are commonly reported emergent presentations to referral hospitals, reports of esophageal or caudal mediastinal fishhook foreign bodies involving a pulmonary artery or vein are limited to one suspected case in a group of 75 dogs undergoing endoscopic or surgical removal of fishhook foreign bodies.1,5,6,9,11 In that case, confirmation of pulmonary vasculature involvement was not made surgically but was suspected following acute patient death during endoscopic manipulation of the fishhook.5 Clinically, consideration for thoracic vascular involvement is critical, particularly when deciding between endoscopic and surgical fishhook retrieval. Endoscopic retrieval of a fishhook involving a large vessel within the thorax could lead to vessel tearing, followed by acute hemothorax or hemomediastinum and rapid patient deterioration.

In the cases presented here, the decision was made to use endoscopy as a diagnostic modality for suspected esophageal fishhook foreign bodies. If appropriate, the diagnostic use of endoscopy would have been converted into a therapeutic function for fishhook retrieval. In the absence of endoscopy for diagnostic purposes, positive contrast esophagography may be performed to help determine the location of a suspected esophageal foreign body and assess for esophageal perforation. However, given the metallic radioopacity of both a fishhook and most iodinated contrast solutions, positive contrast esophagography could have further complicated the determination between esophageal and mediastinal fishhook location.

The two cases presented here had similar radiographic findings of a fishhook foreign body present caudal to the cardiac silhouette and cranial to the diaphragm. Both underwent endoscopy, but limited visibility of the fishhook within the lumen of the esophagus and concern for potential esophageal laceration during fishhook extraction led to the decision to pursue surgical fishhook retrieval. In both cases, the fishhook was found to be engaging the left caudal pulmonary artery. Attempted endoscopic retrieval of the fishhook in either case could have led to acute large volume uncontrolled hemorrhage because of the amount of arterial wall ensnared by the fishhook, potentially leading to death. Michels et al. described endoscopic and surgical retrieval of fishhooks from the stomach or esophagus of dogs and cats (n = 75), in which one dog died following attempted endoscopic retrieval of a fishhook secondary to laceration of a pulmonary vein.5 The fishhook was reported to be caudal to the heart base on radiographs, consistent with the two cases reported here.

Endoscopic retrieval of esophageal fishhooks has been described in detail and typically involves grasping the fish hook as close to the barbs as possible and pulling both the hook and the scope from the esophagus simultaneously.5,6 The esophagus is then re-evaluated for tears and abrasions. Surgical removal either involves an esophagostomy or clipping the barb from the hook, followed by endoscopic retrieval of the shaft from the stomach.12 Alternatively, if fishhook extraction from the affected vessel is not feasible, complete lung lobectomy with ligation of the associated bronchus, artery, and vein is an acceptable method for managing caudal mediastinal foreign bodies in which a pulmonary vessel is compromised. The caudal esophagus may either be approached using left sided thoracotomy (to avoid the caudal vena cava), a combined ventral midline laparotomy and diaphragmatic incision, or caudal median sternotomy.13 If the barb is found to be penetrating the contralateral (right) side of the esophagus, the esophagus can be gently rotated via stay sutures until the contralateral wall is visible, or a left esophagotomy can be made to allow visualization of the right esophageal wall. In the cases presented here, the fishhooks were both deemed accessible via left eighth intercostal thoracotomy based on radiographic and endoscopic location of the fishhooks toward the left of the esophagus and based on the radiographic craniocaudal position of the fishhook within the thorax. Surgical removal of the embedded fishhook required two pairs of needle drivers and two people (surgeon and assistant surgeon) to hold the fishhook steady and prevent excessive movement during the cutting of the hook. Clean transection of the fishhook shaft with wire cutters (i.e., a cut that did not compromise the esophageal wall, pulmonary artery, nearby lung tissue, or only partially transect the fishhook) was desired to create minimal movement during fishhook extraction.

Conclusion

This case report is a unique presentation of two cases of caudal mediastinal fishhook foreign bodies involving a pulmonary artery. To the authors’ knowledge, there is no literature describing confirmed pulmonary artery involvement from an intrathoracic fishhook foreign body. Although previous literature shows no correlation between endoscopic success and fishhook location within the upper gastrointestinal tract, esophageal fishhooks caudal to the cardiac silhouette may have vascular involvement, and clinicians should exercise caution when attempting endoscopic retrieval of fishhooks in this location.6

The authors would like to acknowledge and thank Surf City Pet Hospital, Sneads Ferry, NC, and Park Veterinary Hospital and Urgent Care, Durham, NC, for their patient referrals.

REFERENCES

  • 1.
    Thompson HC
    ,
    CortesY
    ,
    GannonK
    , et al
    . Esophageal foreign bodies in dogs: 34 cases (2004-2009). J Vet Emerg Crit Care2012;22(
    2
    ):25361.
  • 2.
    Doran IP
    ,
    WrightCA
    ,
    MooreAH
    . Acute oropharyngeal and esophageal stick injury in forty-one dogs. Vet Surg2008;37(
    8
    ):7815.
  • 3.
    Pratt CL
    ,
    ReinekeEL
    ,
    DrobatazKJ
    . Sewing needle foreign body ingestion in dogs and cats: 65 cases (2000-2012). J Am Vet Med Assoc2014;245(
    3
    ):3028.
  • 4.
    Sutton JS
    ,
    CulpWT
    ,
    ScottiK
    , et al
    . Perioperative morbidity and outcome of esophageal surgery in dogs and cats: 72 cases (1993-2013). J Am Vet Med Assoc2016;249(
    7
    ):78793.
  • 5.
    Michels GM
    ,
    JonesBD
    ,
    HussBT
    , et al
    . Endoscopic and surgical retrieval of fishhooks from the stomach and esophagus in dogs and cats: 75 cases (1977-1993). J Am Vet Med Assoc1995;207:11947.
  • 6.
    Iwamuro M
    ,
    OkadaH
    ,
    KawaiD
    , et al
    . Endoscopic removal of a fishhook in the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc2009;70(
    3
    ):5501.
  • 7.
    Hyland RJ
    . Surgical removal of a fish hook from the oesophagus of a turtle. Aust Vet J2002;80(
    1–2
    ):546.
  • 8.
    Sale CS
    ,
    WilliamsJM
    . Results of transthoracic esophagotomy retrieval of esophageal foreign body obstructions in dogs: 14 cases (2000-2004). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc2006;42(
    6
    ):4506.
  • 9.
    Cohn LA
    ,
    StollMR
    ,
    BransonKR
    , et al
    . Fatal hemothorax following management of an esophageal foreign body. J Am Animal Hosp Assoc2003;39(
    3
    ):2516.
  • 10.
    Keir I
    ,
    WoolfordL
    ,
    HirstC
    , et al
    . Fatal aortic oesophageal fistula following oesophageal foreign body removal in a dog. J Small Anim Pract2010;51(
    12
    ):65760.
  • 11.
    Gianella P
    ,
    PfammatterNS
    ,
    BurgenerIA
    . Oesophageal and gastric endoscopic foreign body removal: complications and follow-up of 102 dogs. J Small Anim Pract2009;50(
    12
    ):64953.
  • 12.
    Deroy C
    ,
    Benoit CorcuffJB
    ,
    BillenF
    , et al
    . Removal of oesophageal foreign bodies: comparison between oesopaghoscopy and oesophagotomy in 39 dogs. J Small Anim Pract2015;56(
    10
    ):61317.
  • 13.
    Kyles AE
    . Esophagus. In:
    Tobias, KM
    ,
    JohnstonSA
    , eds. Veterinary Surgery: Small Animal,
    1st Ed.
    ,
    St. Louis
    :
    Elsevier
    ; 2012:146183.

Footnotes

  1. Fentanyl citrate intravenous solution; West-Ward Pharmaceutical Corp., Eatontown, New Jersey

  2. Propofol; Sargent Pharmaceuticals, Schaumburg, Illinois

  3. Isoflurane; Primal Enterprises Limited, Andhra Pradesh, India

  4. Olympus GIF Vet PQ140, 8.9 mm scope, 2.8 mm channel; Olympus, Center Valley, Pennsylvania

  5. Cefazolin; Hospira Inc., Lake Forest, Illinois

  6. 4% Chlorhexidine gluconate; Molnlycke Health Care US, LLC, Norcross, Georgia

  7. Prolene polypropylene suture; Ethicon US, LLC, Cincinnati, Ohio

  8. Prolene; MILA International Inc., Florence, Kentucky

  9. Fentanyl citrate transdermal patch; Mallinckrodt Inc., Hazelwood, Missouri

  10. Carprofen; Putney Inc., Portland, Maine

  11. Hydromorphone; West-Ward Pharmaceutical Corp., Eatontown, New Jersey

  12. Tramadol; Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Cranbury, New Jersey

  13. Omeprazole; Apotex Inc., Toronto, Canada

  14. PO (per os)
Copyright: © 2019 by American Animal Hospital Association 2019
<bold>FIGURE 1</bold>
FIGURE 1

Ventrodorsal (A) and lateral (B) thoracic radiographic projections of Case 1 at presentation to the Randall B. Terry, Jr. Companion Animal Veterinary Medical Center at North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine. Note the location of the metal foreign bodies (fishhook and leader) present in the caudal mediastinum, caudal to the heart base and cranial to the diaphragm. Mild pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax are identified, consistent with esophageal perforation by the fishhook. The remainder of the thorax is unremarkable.


Contributor Notes

Correspondence: aedunlap@ncsu.edu (A.E.D.)
Accepted: 30 Jun 2018
  • Download PDF