Two Cases of Planned Relaparotomy for Severe Peritonitis Secondary to Gastrointestinal Pathology
Planned relaparotomy is a technique in which two or more surgeries are planned before or during the initial surgery. Two dogs underwent planned relaparotomy for severe peritonitis secondary to gastric ulceration and linear foreign body. Both dogs had good outcomes, and unnecessary procedures that would likely have led to increased morbidity were avoided. This technique may be useful in avoiding unnecessary procedures as well as providing for better stabilization of the animal.
Introduction
Planned relaparotomy in humans was initially performed for uncontrolled bleeding following liver trauma.1 The abdomen was packed with laparotomy pads and temporarily closed in order to place continual pressure on the bleeding sites. Once the blood loss had stopped and the patient was stabilized, a second surgery was performed to remove the laparotomy pads, visualize the wounds, and perform further procedures if needed.1 Planned relaparotomy has also been used in other traumatic situations and in cases of secondary peritonitis, which is defined as peritonitis arising from diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.2–4 Indications for planned relaparotomy in humans currently include trauma, peritonitis, increased intra-abdominal pressure, patient destabilization, and coagulopathies.2,5–8 Planned relaparotomy is also used in patients requiring surgical stabilization prior to transfer to specialty centers for definitive treatment.7–10
Severe secondary peritonitis carries a high mortality and morbidity.5 Frequent complications include the systemic inflammatory response syndrome, multiple organ dysfunction, and disseminated intravascular coagulation.11 Management of secondary peritonitis via one surgical procedure includes definitive repair of the gastrointestinal tract followed by primary closure, open abdominal drainage, or abdominal closure with closed suction drains.12–14 In cases of secondary peritonitis, planned relaparotomy can offer advantages over a single surgery.4,5 One of these advantages is the possible avoidance of unnecessary surgical procedures. Severe peritonitis changes the appearance of tissues and can obscure necrotic borders, making initial surgical decisions difficult.15 In such cases, the initial laparotomy is used to lavage the abdomen, close hollow viscous perforations, and establish drainage. During the second laparotomy, viable tissues may improve in their appearance, which allows for more accurate surgical decisions.15 Planned relaparotomy can also be used in cases of peritonitis if destabilization of the animal during the initial surgery causes the surgery to be aborted.7,8 Other possible indications for planned relaparotomy include allowing for transfer of the animal to a specialist for a second surgery, if there is need for a procedure in which the doctor performing the initial surgery has not been trained.7,9,10 The purpose of this report is to demonstrate the use of planned relaparotomy in two dogs for the management of severe peritonitis secondary to gastrointestinal pathology.
Case Reports
Case No. 1
A 12-year-old, 24-kg, spayed female Belgian sheepdog was presented obtunded and laterally recumbent. The dog had a history of a poor appetite and diarrhea for 1 week, and she was currently on cephalexin for superficial pyoderma and deracoxib for osteoarthritis. Rectal temperature was 100.0°F, heart rate was 120 beats per minute, and the femoral pulses were weak and synchronous. The dog’s abdomen was distended and moderately painful upon palpation. Oxygen therapy and lactated Ringer’s solution were started. After a bolus of intravenous (IV) fluids, systolic blood pressure was 100 mm Hg. Purified hemoglobina (5 mL/kg IV) and fresh-frozen plasma (10 mL/kg IV) were administered during resuscitation, and hydromorphoneb (0.06 mg/kg IV) was given for pain.
On abdominal ultrasonography, a large amount of free abdominal fluid was present; no pleural or pericardial fluid was evident. Abdominocentesis revealed a dark brown, flocculent fluid, and on cytology a mixed population of extra- and intracellular bacteria and degenerate neutrophils were seen. A diagnosis of septic peritonitis was made. Analysis of a venous blood sample revealed acidemia (pH 7.251; reference range 7.36 to 7.44), significant metabolic acidosis (bicarbonate [HCO3] 11.4 mEq/L; reference range 18 to 22 mEq/L), and a respiratory alkalosis (partial pressure of venous carbon dioxide [PvCO2] 25.8 mm Hg; reference range 36 to 44 mm Hg). Lactate was elevated at 7.2 mmol/L (reference range 0 to 2 mmol/L). Other laboratory abnormalities included elevations of blood urea nitrogen (105 mg/dL; reference range 7 to 27 mg/dL) and creatinine (4.5 mg/dL; reference range 0.4 to 1.8 mg/dL), as well as hyponatremia (132.7 mEq/L; reference range 141 to 156 mEq/L), hypoalbuminemia (0.4 g/dL; reference range 2.6 to 4.3 g/dL), and a low-normal blood glucose (79 g/dL; reference range 78 to 126 g/dL). Platelets were slightly decreased at 142,000/μL (reference range 200,000 to 500,000/μL). Prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) were within normal limits. Fifty percent dextrosec (200 mg/kg) was given as an IV bolus, and ticarcillin/clavulanated (67 mg/kg IV), enrofloxacine (6.7 mg/kg IV), and famotidinef (0.6 mg/kg IV) were also started.
Once the dog was stabilized, an emergency exploratory laparotomy was performed. Anesthesia was induced with diazepamg (0.5 mg/kg IV) and propofolh (4 mg/kg IV) and was maintained with isofluranei in oxygen. Upon entry into the abdominal cavity, a large amount of cloudy, brown fluid containing grass and food particles was encountered. A severe, generalized peritonitis with petechiation was noted on all serosal surfaces. Three areas of gastric perforation were detected along the body and pyloric antrum. Partially adhered omentum appeared necrotic, and adjacent gastric tissue was friable and purple to black in color. Demarcation between necrotic and healthy tissues was unclear. The viability of the pyloric area was questionable, which indicated the possible need for a Bilroth procedure. Despite IV administration of lactated Ringer’s solution, fresh-frozen plasma (21 mL/kg), and hetastarch (1.25 mL/kg per hour), systolic blood pressure decreased to 80 mm Hg and did not respond to a hetastarch bolus (6 mL/kg) or dopamine IV. The decision was made to temporarily seal the gastric perforations and lavage the abdomen, with the intention of performing a second laparotomy 12 to 24 hours later. Gastric perforations were closed with 2-0 polydiaxanonek in a Lembert pattern, and the abdomen was lavaged with warm, sterile saline. The linea alba and skin were sutured with a loose simple continuous suture pattern that provided a 1-cm gap for fluid to drain. A sterile, absorbent bandage was placed around the abdomen, and a nasogastric tube was inserted.
Postoperatively, lactated Ringer’s solution, dextrose, potassium chloride, hetastarch, and dopamine were continued IV. Oxygen saturation measured via pulse oximetry (SpO2) was 86%, so unilateral nasal oxygen was also started. The nasogastric tube was suctioned every hour to keep the stomach decompressed. Because the packed cell volume (PCV) was low (26%; reference range 38% to 47%), and in order to maximize oxygen delivery to the tissues prior to the second surgery, a transfusion of 2 units of packed red blood cells was initiated. Blood pressure stabilized following the transfusion. Fentanyll (5 μg/kg per minute IV) was given for pain control. Intravenous ticarcillin-clavulanate and famotidine were continued.
Fifteen hours after the initial surgery, the abdomen was re-explored. Generalized peritonitis appeared significantly improved from the prior surgery. A large portion of the omentum was necrotic and was resected. The necrotic area of the stomach was well demarcated, and the temporary closures of the gastric wall were within the necrotic area, which encompassed approximately one-third of the stomach (including much of the body and part of the pyloric antrum). Resection of the necrotic portion of the stomach was accomplished using a stapling device.m As the pylorus appeared viable, a Bilroth procedure was not performed. The abdomen was lavaged with warm, sterile saline; two closed-suction drainsn were placed; and the abdomen was routinely closed.
The dog recovered smoothly from anesthesia and was continued on crystalloid solutions, fentanyl (5 μg/kg per hour IV), and hetastarch (20 mL/kg per day IV). One episode of vomiting occurred postoperatively and was treated with metoclopramideo (0.56 mg/kg per hour IV). The suction drains initially collected a large amount of serosanguineous fluid, but they were removed 48 hours postoperatively when the amount of drainage decreased and cytology revealed no bacteria. The dog was started on small amounts of a bland diet 36 hours postoperatively and was switched to oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acidp (375 mg q 12 hours), famotidineq (10 mg q 24 hours), sucralfater (1 g q 8 hours), and metoclopramides (5 mg q 8 hours) prior to discharge 4 days after the second surgery.
Case No. 2
A 9-year-old, 60-kg, castrated male bullmastiff with a history of foreign body ingestion was presented as an emergency after being found laterally recumbent and surrounded by vomitus. On presentation, the dog was obtunded and recumbent. Rectal temperature was 99.8°F, heart rate was 160 beats per minute, and respiratory rate was 50 breaths per minute. Laboratory tests revealed elevations of PCV (64%; reference range 37% to 55%), total protein (11 g/dL; reference range 5.8 to 7.9 g/dL), platelets (566,000/μL; reference range 200,000 to 500,000/μL), blood lactate (14 mmol/L; reference range 0 to 2 mmol/L), albumin (4.6 g/dL; reference range 2.6 to 4.3 g/dL), alkaline phosphatase (266 U/L; reference range 23 to 212 U/L), creatinine (2.8 mg/dL; reference range 0.4 to 1.8 mg/dL), calcium (12.7 mg/dL; reference range 7.9 to 12 mg/dL), and cholesterol (460 mg/dL; reference range 110 to 320 mg/dL). Mild hypokalemia (3.04 mEq/L; reference range 4.0 to 5.6 mEq/L) was also found. Prothrombin time was slightly elevated (16 seconds; reference range 8 to 14 seconds), but APTT was within normal limits.
Initial therapy included IV lactated Ringer’s solution, hydromorphone (0.07 mg/kg IV), cefazolint (33 mg/kg IV q 8 hours), enrofloxacin (6.7 mg/kg IV q 24 hours), and chlorpromazineu (0.8 mg/kg SC q 8 hours). Lateral and ventrodorsal abdominal radiographs revealed markedly dilated small intestines and loss of serosal detail in the cranial abdomen. Because of the radiographic findings and a historical suspicion of ingestion of a foreign body, an exploratory laparotomy was performed.
Anesthesia was induced with propofol (4.2 mg/kg IV) and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. Abdominal exploration revealed multiple gastric foreign bodies and a linear jejunal foreign body that had caused plication from the duodenal flexure to the distal ileum. A diffuse peritonitis was also present. A gastrotomy and four enterotomies were performed to remove the foreign bodies. The viability of the entire small intestine was questionable [Figure 1]. The decision was made to perform a second celiotomy 24 hours later to assess the viability of the bowel, rather than risk short-bowel syndrome secondary to resection of most of the small intestine. The abdomen was lavaged with warm, sterile saline; the linea and skin were loosely apposed; and a bandage was applied as described for case no. 1.
Postoperatively, crystalloids, potassium chloride, and hetastarch were administered IV, as well as an IV infusion of morphine, lidocaine, and ketamine for pain control. Cefazolin, enrofloxacin, and chlorpromazine were continued as before, and metronidazolev (20 mg/kg IV q 12 hours) was added. Twenty-four hours later, the abdomen was explored a second time. The small intestine, including the enterotomy sites, appeared viable, though a diffuse peritonitis was still present [Figure 2]. Omentum was placed over the most severely discolored serosal sites, and an elective circumcostal gastropexy was performed. The abdomen was lavaged with warm, sterile saline; a closed suction drainn was placed; and the abdomen was closed routinely.
Drug administration continued with IV crystalloids; hetastarch; a continuous infusion of ketamine, morphine, and lidocaine; and cefazolin, enrofloxacin, and metronidazole. Serosanguineous fluid was evacuated from the drain until the drain was removed 2 days later, at which time fluid collection was minimal. Cytology of the abdominal drainage prior to drain removal revealed no infectious organisms. The dog was started on oral feedings 24 hours after the second surgery; but after an episode of vomiting, metoclopramide (0.05 mg/kg per hour IV) and famotidine (0.3 mg/kg per os [PO] q 12 hours) were given. The dog was discharged from the hospital 7 days after the second surgery, with postoperative administration of amoxicillinw (17 mg/kg PO q 12 hours), metronidazole (21 mg/kg PO q 12 hours), metoclopramide (0.25 mg/kg PO q 8 hours), and enrofloxacinx (2.3 mg/kg PO q 12 hours). The dog recovered well and had no clinical signs until he was presented 4 months later with another gastric foreign body, which was removed via gastrotomy. During surgery, the intestines were normal in appearance.
Discussion
Numerous studies in people and animals have been published on the management of severe peritonitis.11–14,16–23 These studies have often been retrospective, uncontrolled clinical investigations of a single management option (i.e., open abdominal drainage or primary closure with or without closed suction drain placement), so interpretations have been limited. Consequently, the preferred management approach for severe peritonitis remains controversial. The cases reported here describe a method of surgical management that differs from previously described options. Planned relaparotomy is a specific technique that refers to the planning of one or more surgeries either before or during the initial surgery, as opposed to relaparotomy on demand, in which further surgeries are performed if indicated based on the patient’s clinical condition.20 Planned relaparotomy can include any of the previously described management options between surgeries, and it allows for the first surgery to be used to assess and control damage rather than being used for definitive repair.8 It allows potentially unnecessary procedures to be avoided at the initial surgery, provides better stabilization of the animal, and allows time for transfer to a specialist if indicated.7–10
Both dogs in this report were managed with open abdominal drainage between surgeries. Open drainage was chosen to allow for maximal drainage of inflammatory fluid and for ease of entry during second surgery. However, planned relaparotomy can also be performed after closure (with or without drainage) of the abdomen.4,5
The decision to use planned relaparotomy in the first case reported here was made intraoperatively, based on the appearance of the tissues and hemodynamic deterioration of the patient during anesthesia. During the initial surgery, the necrotic tissue appeared to include the pylorus, in which case a Bilroth procedure would have been required. By giving the animal supportive care and time, the demarcation between healthy and diseased tissue became clearer, and in the end a less aggressive surgical procedure (i.e., a partial gastric resection) was appropriate. Performing the resection during a later, second procedure, when the demarcation of necrotic tissue borders was well defined, also ensured that necrotic tissue would not be inadvertently left behind and lead to ongoing inflammation and potential dehiscence.
In the second case, initially it appeared that a radical intestinal resection and anastamosis were required, which would have resulted in short-bowel syndrome. By performing a second laparotomy, the viability of the intestine was more accurately assessed, and an unnecessary surgical procedure that would have resulted in life-long consequences for the dog was prevented.
Conclusion
Two dogs underwent planned relaparotomy for severe peritonitis secondary to gastrointestinal pathology. The additional time and better stabilization between surgeries allowed for a more accurate assessment of the tissues during a second surgery, and this technique prevented the need for radical procedures first thought necessary. Planned relaparotomy should be considered in dogs when peritonitis or hemodynamic instability may cause an altered appearance to the tissues and make surgical decisions more difficult.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Kate Hopper, DVM, Diplomate ACVECC for her assistance in manuscript preparation.
Oxyglobin; Biopure, Cambridge, MA 02141
Hydromorphone HCl; Elkins-Sinn, Inc., Saint Davids, PA 19087
50% Dextrose; Butler Company, Dublin, OH 43017
Timentin; Glaxo SmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Baytril Injectable; Bayer Healthcare, West Haven, CT 06516
Famotidine injectable; Bedford Laboratories, Bedford, OH 44146
Diazepam; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL 60064
Propofol; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL 60064
Isoflurane; Halocarbon Laboratories, River Edge, NJ 07661
Hespan; Jorgenson Laboratories, Loveland, CO 80538
PDS; Ethicon, Johnson and Johnson, Sommerville, NJ 08876
Fentanyl; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL 60064
TA 90-4.8; US Surgical Corporation, Norwalk, CT 06856
Jackson Pratt drain; Allegiance Healthcare, McGaw Park, IL 60085
Metoclopramide injectable; Mayne Pharma, Paramus, NJ 07652
Clavamox; Glaxo SmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Famotidine tablets; Leiner Health Products, Carson, CA 90745
Sucralfate; Martec Pharmaceutical, Kansas City, MO 64120
Metoclopramide tablets; Pliva Inc., East Hanover, NJ 07936
Cefazolin; Schein Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, NJ 07932
Chlorpromazine injectable; B&B Pharmacy, Bellflower, CA 90706
Metronidazole; Mutual Pharmaceutical, Philadelphia, PA 19124
Amoxi Tab; Pfizer Animal Health, New York, NY 10017
Baytril tablets; Bayer Corporation, Shawnee Mission, KS 06516



Citation: Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 43, 2; 10.5326/0430117



Citation: Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 43, 2; 10.5326/0430117

Photograph of a 9-year-old, castrated male bull-mastiff (case no. 2), taken during the initial laparotomy and showing the questionably necrotic areas (arrows) in the jejunum.


