Editorial Type: Endocrinology
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Sept 2005

Feline Acromegaly: A Review of the Syndrome

DVM and
DVM, Diplomate ACVIM
Article Category: Other
Page Range: 292 – 297
DOI: 10.5326/0410292
Save
Download PDF

Acromegaly is characterized by chronic excessive growth hormone (GH) secretion by the pituitary gland. Feline acromegaly is most commonly caused by a functional pituitary tumor. Definitive diagnosis can be difficult because of the gradual disease onset, subtle clinical signs, unavailability of relevant laboratory tests, and client financial investment. The most significant clinical finding of acromegaly is the presence of insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus. Diagnosis is currently based upon brain imaging and measurement of serum GH and/or insulin-like growth factor-1 concentrations. Definitive treatment in cats is not well described, but radiation therapy appears promising.

Introduction

The term acromegaly is Greek in origin, derived from akron, which means extremity, and megale, which means giant. It is a descriptive term for the classic clinical features of the syndrome in humans (i.e., enlargement of the hands, feet, and facial features). Acromegaly, or hypersomatotropism, is a rare syndrome characterized by chronic excessive growth hormone (GH) secretion by the pituitary gland.19 Reports of feline acromegaly in the veterinary literature are sparse, and its true incidence is unknown. The authors found 28 cases of feline acromegaly reported in the peer-reviewed literature. The purpose of this article is to review the diagnosis and treatment of feline acromegaly, drawing comparisons to human acromegaly where relevant.

Pathophysiology

The GH oversecretion that defines acromegaly leads to a broad spectrum of clinical signs secondary to both anabolic and catabolic effects. Growth hormone has direct catabolic actions by stimulating hepatic glucose production, promoting lipolysis, and increasing lipid oxidation.10 Insulin-antagonizing and diabetogenic properties of GH also indirectly cause catabolism. Despite its apparent low incidence, acromegaly remains an important cause of insulin-resistant diabetes in cats.1,2,6,8,11 Insulin resistance is thought to develop from a postreceptor defect in insulin action at the level of target tissues.11,12 With excessive GH production, persistent hyperglycemia develops and results in promotion of a hyperinsulinemic state. Excessively high circulating serum insulin concentration leads to downregulation of insulin receptors on target tissues and carbohydrate intolerance.1,3,6,1315 All reported feline acromegalics have concurrent diabetes mellitus and require insulin administration, and most of these animals have a history of insulin resistance.16,11,1518

Anabolic activities of GH are mediated by somatomedin C, or insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), which is a hormone predominantly produced by the liver.1,2,4,6,19,20 Through its promotion of protein synthesis and stimulation of growth mechanisms, IGF-1 is responsible for the excessive soft-tissue growth (e.g., viscera, tongue, cartilage) and bony remodeling and thickening (e.g., mandible, calvarium, vertebrae) that characterize acromegaly.1,6,21

Other than one report of a cat developing acromegalic features following exogenous progesterone administration, the most commonly recognized etiology of feline acromegaly is a functional somatotrophic adenoma in the anterior pituitary pars distalis.16,17,18,2224 From reported cases, it appears that the most typical signalment for acromegaly is that of a middle-aged to older, castrated male cat with insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus; however, more cases must be described to ascertain if this signalment is indeed most common.6,8,11 All reported cases have been mixed-breed cats.

Diagnosis

Clinical and Routine Laboratory Findings

Clinical findings typically include insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus, organomegaly (e.g., liver, spleen, kidneys), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), inferior prognathia, prominent or broad facial features, spondylosis deformans, and peripheral neuropathy.14 The respiratory stridor that occurs in humans and dogs has only been reported in one cat.1

Since many acromegalic cats have cardiac changes consistent with HCM, Kittleson et al. measured GH concentrations in 31 cats that had no clinical signs of acromegaly but had been previously diagnosed with HCM.25 They found that serum GH concentration was significantly greater in the HCM-affected population than in a paired normal population of cats. However, when compared to acromegalic cats with a functional pituitary tumor, the GH increase in HCM cats was meager.25 Gross and histopathological postmortem examination of pituitary glands from eight cats with HCM found no pituitary abnormalities.25 Serum IGF-1 measurements were not reported in this study. It is important to realize that increased GH concentrations can occur with diseases other than acromegaly, and further understanding of GH physiology in health and disease is required.

Serum biochemical abnormalities in acromegalic cats include hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, mild increases in serum alanine aminotransaminase (ALT) and serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activities, hypochloridemia, hypercalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, hyperproteinemia, and elevated serum urea nitrogen.14,11 Many of these changes may be explained by unregulated diabetes mellitus and possibly underlying subclinical dehydration. Mild to moderate hyperphosphatemia without overt evidence of renal dysfunction (i.e., azotemia) has been a feature of acromegaly in almost one third of the reported cases.15,11 Growth hormone-induced renal phosphate reabsorption and not renal failure may explain this finding. Total hyperproteinemia was recognized by Peterson et al. in approximately 60% (9/14) of affected cases.4 Urinalysis findings have included glucosuria without ketonuria.4,11 The most commonly reported hematological change in feline acromegalics is erythrocytosis, which has been attributed to GH or IGF-1 effects on the bone marrow.1,11,26

Definitive diagnosis of acromegaly can be difficult because of an unavailability of relevant laboratory tests and the large financial investment often required of the client to reach a diagnosis. It is a great challenge to establish a timely diagnosis of this chronic, insidious disease. Physical changes of acromegaly may be subtle, and obvious conformational enlargement may not be the most recognizable feature in some cats or may not be present at all. The most significant clinical finding that should prompt a clinician to consider acromegaly in a cat is the presence of insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus.1

Brain Imaging

Computed tomography (CT) scanning or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain may help confirm acromegaly if imaging demonstrates a mass lesion in the area of the pituitary gland2,4,11 [Figures 1A, 1B, 1C]. Utilizing contrast-enhanced CT, Elliott et al. evaluated the pituitary glands of 16 insulin-resistant cats, 12 of which were considered likely to have acromegaly based on biochemical testing and/or ruling out of other etiologies of insulin resistance.15 The other four cats were diagnosed with pituitary-dependent hyperadrenocorticism. All 16 cats had exhibited a pituitary mass extending dorsally to the rim of the sella turcica.15 Additionally, other reports exist of six feline acromegalics with normal adrenal function having pituitary masses visualized on brain CT or MRI.2,3,16,22 Peterson et al. reported CT-confirmed pituitary masses in five of six cats.4 While most of the cases reported by Peterson et al. were screened for hyperadrenocorticism, it was unclear whether hyperadrenocorticism was ruled out in the six cats that underwent brain CT scanning.4 Based on the current knowledge of feline acromegaly, finding a pituitary mass lends support to the diagnosis of this disease; however, hyperadrenocorticism, which can also be associated with pituitary masses and cause insulin resistance, must be ruled out via adrenal function testing.

Endocrine Testing

Current requirements for definitive diagnosis of acromegaly include documentation of elevated serum GH and/or IGF-1 concentrations.6,11 Growth hormone measurements are not currently commercially available in the United States, but they are available at Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Growth hormone secretion is normally pulsatile.25,27 Even during acromegaly, GH secretion is episodic; however, the duration, amplitude, and frequency of secretory events are increased.1,7 Owing to an extremely short half-life, GH is rapidly cleared from the circulation, and basal GH levels are usually undetectable.7 Single, random, serum GH measurements have been unreliable in the diagnosis of acromegaly in humans.1,7,28

In contrast, of the reported feline cases having single serum GH measurements performed, all have had documented increases in serum GH, which suggests that this test may be useful in the diagnosis of acromegaly in the cat.1,35,18,22 In a report of 14 acromegalic cats, serum basal GH levels measured by a heterologous canine radioimmunoassay (RIA) method were found to be increased when compared with paired normal samples.4 Ten subjects from that study underwent necropsy, which confirmed the presence of a pituitary acidophil adenoma.4 Increased GH concentration measured by RIA has been reported in three other feline acromegalics with a necropsy-confirmed pituitary acidophil adenoma.1,18,22 Finally, two additional reports documented increased GH levels in eight acromegalic cats that had a pituitary mass confirmed with contrast-enhanced CT scanning.3,15 These findings suggest that GH measurements, when available, are an important component of the diagnostic strategy for acromegaly in cats.

The diagnostic utility of GH measurements may be improved by concurrent measurement of serum IGF-1, which serves as an indicator of serum GH levels over a 24-hour period.1,7 The veterinary literature has documented increased serum IGF-1 concentrations in five cats with naturally occurring, necropsy-confirmed acromegaly.1,2,16,17 Additionally, above-normal serum IGF-1 concentrations were documented in six diabetic cats suspected of having naturally occurring acromegaly based on consistent clinical signs, CT-confirmed pituitary masses, elimination of other differential diagnoses, and/or increased serum GH concentration.1,15 Elliott et al. confirmed pituitary macroadenomas at necropsy in two insulin-resistant diabetic cats suspected of acromegaly, but it was unclear whether IGF-1, GH, or both were measured in these cats.15 Norman and Mooney found a normal serum IGF-1 concentration at initial presentation in one cat diagnosed with acromegaly, but an increased serum IGF-1 concentration was eventually documented in this animal.1

Lewitt et al. recently published data suggesting that circulating serum IGF-1 concentrations may be increased in diabetic cats that do not exhibit clinical signs consistent with acromegaly.21 From this work, it was concluded that use of IGF-1 concentrations to screen for GH excess might be unreliable in diabetic cats. However, this report only examined eight diabetic cats and compared the results to only eight normal cats.21 Acromegaly was not definitively ruled out in these eight diabetic cats. Three of the eight diabetic cats had brain CT scans that failed to demonstrate a pituitary tumor, but GH was not measured in any animal.21 Drawing conclusions about the ability of IGF-1 to screen for GH excess when GH concentrations have not been measured is difficult. The report by Lewitt et al. does address, however, the need for further investigation of the use of different biochemical markers in the diagnostic pursuit of acromegaly.21

Current research has also focused on the use of other biochemical markers in the diagnosis of acromegaly.7 Insulin-like growth factor binding-protein-3 (IGFBP-3) is a heterodimeric, apparently GH-dependent, glycoprotein that binds IGF-1 and IGF-2 in circulation.7,29 Initial assessment of this marker showed it is a fairly sensitive indicator of GH excess even in acromegalic humans who demonstrate GH suppression (i.e., <2 ng/mL after glucose administration).7,21,29 Initial evaluation by Lewitt et al. indicated that the biochemical behavior of IGFBP-3 may be different in diabetic cats when compared to normal cats, so its utility in the diagnosis of feline acromegaly has yet to be determined.21 Further investigation of various biochemical markers in normal and abnormal GH physiology in small animals is needed.

Treatment

Goals and Monitoring

Treatment of acromegaly presents the veterinarian with an even greater challenge than that offered by diagnosis, and the veterinary literature regarding treatment is sparse. Several treatment modalities in humans are reported, but the definition of “cure” is controversial.7,3034 The most appropriate way to treat this disease in cats has yet to be described. Attention should also be paid to how veterinarians measure response to treatment. Tracking of exogenous insulin requirements and glycemic control have been utilized as indicators of GH normalization in cats.3,4 Perhaps a broader assessment should be sought and should include owner opinion of an animal’s quality of life, pituitary tumor size, serum IGF-1 concentrations, and serum GH concentrations. Abrams-Ogg et al. have reported increasing serum IGF-1 concentrations as a negative indicator of therapeutic response.16 Establishing a biochemical marker to facilitate surveillance of treatment success and disease progression is imperative.

Surgical Options

Abrams-Ogg, et al. reported on the application of trans-sphenoidal cryotherapy as treatment for a cat with a biopsy-confirmed GH-producing pituitary acidophil adenoma.16 The cat was clinically stable for several weeks postoperatively, but then developed severe neurological clinical signs (i.e., seizures, aggression, visual impairment, etc.).16 Cryoinjury to neural tissues surrounding the pituitary gland and neural damage secondary to hypoglycemia were suspected.16 The surgical approach most often utilized for affected humans is the trans-sphenoidal hypophysectomy or adenomectomy.7,32 These procedures have not been evaluated in the cat.35

Radiotherapy

Radiation therapy is used for human acromegalics when surgery is not an option, when there is extensive postoperative residual disease, or when clinical signs of acromegaly return despite surgical and/or medical intervention.33 Efficacy of radiation therapy in humans is controversial.34,36,37 A major disadvantage of radiotherapy is that it may take a considerable amount of time (months to years) before it is fully effective.34,38

Reports on the use of radiation therapy for treatment of acromegaly in animals are rare. Goossens et al. reported on the use of Cobalt60 radiotherapy in three diabetic, acromegalic cats diagnosed with pituitary tumors via CT scanning.3 After radiation therapy, all cats experienced a decrease in exogenous insulin requirement. Two cats had complete resolution of diabetes mellitus at 8 and 10 months, respectively.3 Plasma GH levels were measured in all cats at 5, 12, and 24 months, with two cats experiencing euglycemia having significant decreases in circulating GH. The cat that did not have resolution of its diabetes had an increase in circulating GH at 12 months.3 This same cat was diagnosed with renal insufficiency 4 months postradiation therapy, and its diabetes remained unregulated.3

Peterson et al. reported the use of Cobalt60 radiotherapy in two diabetic acromegalic cats with pituitary tumors.4 A 50% reduction in tumor size was noted in one cat on CT scan 2 months after completion of the radiation protocol, and this cat experienced normalization of serum GH and a remission in insulin resistance.4 However, relapse of insulin resistance recurred 6 months postradiation. In the other cat of this report, an increase in serum GH concentration occurred, the tumor appeared larger on follow-up CT scanning, and insulin resistance persisted despite radiation therapy.4 Early results with new radiotherapy methods, such as gamma-knife excision, offer promising results in human acromegalics.38,39 Gamma-knife is a type of stereotactic radiosurgery involving ionizing radiation from a Cobalt60 source. The radiation is delivered by convergent collimated beams focused on a stationary point.40 The result is a single dose of radiation that is sharply focused, potentially with less damage to surrounding tissues.40 Long-term follow-up is still pending for these newer treatments.

Radiation may represent one of the most effective means of controlling acromegaly in cats, especially as new technologies become available. Many of the side effects reported in humans typically occur at a point in time far removed from the actual radiation treatment (i.e., years later).38 Because the life span of the cat is significantly shorter than that of humans, it is possible that these side effects would only rarely develop in the cat. On the other hand, timely improvement may not be witnessed in cats because of the delayed effects of radiation therapy.

Medical Options

Medical options are available to control over-secretion of GH, and they are used in humans when surgery or radiation therapy is not possible, is contraindicated, or has failed.7 Dopamine agonists, somatostatin analogs, and GH receptor antagonists have all been used.2,5,7,11,19,4045

Abraham et al. treated an acromegalic cat with L-deprenyl (5 mg per os [PO] q 24 hours for 30 days, then 10 mg q 24 hours), a monoamineoxidase-B inhibitor that prolongs dopamine activity in the pituitary gland.2 Facilitation of prolonged dopamine activity could, in theory, result in a clinical response similar to that seen in people being treated with dopamine agonists such as bromocriptine or cabergoline.2 However, the cat in that report did not show any clinical improvement while taking L-deprenyl.2 Serum IGF-1 levels were not measured, so it was uncertain whether L-deprenyl had any physiological effect. It was reported that the insulin requirements remained high and that the cat developed a severe degenerative arthropathy and became progressively weaker and more lethargic over a 9-month period, after which it was euthanized.2 More research is needed to better understand the role, if any, that L-deprenyl has in the treatment of feline acromegaly.

Reubi and Landolt demonstrated the presence of somatostatin receptors in the pituitary adenomas of humans.46 Octreotide and lanreotide are the most widely used somatostatin analogs in the treatment of acromegaly in humans.40 These drugs inhibit GH secretion and lower levels of circulating IGF-1.47 Between 70% and 90% of humans reportedly respond to these drugs and achieve some control of GH secretion.7,40,41 Additionally, alleviation of soft-tissue clinical signs associated with acromegaly occurred in as many as 90% of treated cases.7,41,48 Even under the scrutiny of more stringent “cure” definitions (i.e., normalization of IGF-1 levels), somatostatin analogs are successful in people. Some reports indicate that as many as 47% to 60% of treated humans achieve normal IGF-1 levels on these drugs.7,40

Use of octreotide has been reported in only a small number of cats, but unfortunately, it appeared to have no therapeutic effect.4,5 Peterson et al. administered octreotide (5 to 10 μg, subcutaneously [SC] q 12 hours) to two cats that had previously undergone radiotherapy and found no decrease in serum GH concentrations.4 Similarly, Morrison et al. failed to see a response in serum GH concentrations of an acromegalic cat treated with octreotide (100 μg, SC q 12 hours).5

Although initial use of octreotide in feline acromegaly has not been rewarding, further investigation is warranted. There are several theories as to why these cats may not have responded. Perhaps dosing was inappropriate, or perhaps feline tumors do not express the appropriate receptors required for successful drug action. A subset of human patients have tumors that do not express somatostatin receptors, and these patients do not respond to treatment with somatostatin analogs.2,4,43 It is tempting to think that newer, long-acting somatostatin analogue preparations may offer a more reliable means of delivering these potentially useful drugs to acromegalic cats, but their use has not been investigated to date.

Pegvisomant is a genetically engineered analogue of human GH that binds to peripheral GH receptors, rendering the receptors unresponsive to endogenous GH.19,40,42,44 This novel treatment leads to a decrease in IGF-1 production in tissues responsive to GH, resulting in alleviation of anabolic clinical signs or those signs caused by increased circulating IGF-1 concentration.19,40,42 Preliminary reports show that 98% to 100% of humans given daily injections SC experienced a reduction in serum IGF-1 concentration.44,45 Investigation is necessary to determine the role pegvisomant might have in the treatment of feline acromegaly, as the drug has not been evaluated in cats.

Prognosis

Peterson et al. report that survival times of acromegalic cats ranged from 4 to 42 months, with a median of 20.5 months.4 Short-term prognosis can be fair if the cat does not exhibit clinical signs related to tumor expansion (i.e., neurological disease) and if the diabetic state can be controlled with high doses of insulin.1,4 Heart failure, renal failure, development of neurological disease, and complications related to diabetes (e.g., infections, ketoacidosis, coma) are possible sequelae of this disease.14,6,11 Renal failure from glomerulopathy, characterized by expansion of the mesangial matrix and variable periglomerular fibrosis, may occur in some cats.4

Conclusion

Regardless of whether an insulin-resistant diabetic cat demonstrates the classic physical signs of acromegaly, the cat should be screened for acromegaly and other causes of insulin resistance. At this time, brain imaging, serum IGF-1 concentrations, and, when possible, serum GH concentrations are the recommended diagnostic tests for feline acromegaly. Additional research is needed to understand more fully the pathogenesis and incidence of feline acromegaly, to refine diagnostic testing, and to develop successful treatment and monitoring strategies.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Dr. Barbara A. Selcer for providing the figures and their legends for this manuscript.

Figure 1A—. Axial precontrast computed tomography (CT) image at the level of the pituitary fossa. An approximate 1-cm diameter, radiopaque mass (arrows) is present in the midline at the level of the pituitary gland.Figure 1A—. Axial precontrast computed tomography (CT) image at the level of the pituitary fossa. An approximate 1-cm diameter, radiopaque mass (arrows) is present in the midline at the level of the pituitary gland.Figure 1A—. Axial precontrast computed tomography (CT) image at the level of the pituitary fossa. An approximate 1-cm diameter, radiopaque mass (arrows) is present in the midline at the level of the pituitary gland.
Figure 1A Axial precontrast computed tomography (CT) image at the level of the pituitary fossa. An approximate 1-cm diameter, radiopaque mass (arrows) is present in the midline at the level of the pituitary gland.

Citation: Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 41, 5; 10.5326/0410292

Figure 1B—. Axial postcontrast CT image made at the same level as Figure 1A. Little contrast enhancement of the mass (arrows) is seen, but the mass width is greater by 0.5 cm.Figure 1B—. Axial postcontrast CT image made at the same level as Figure 1A. Little contrast enhancement of the mass (arrows) is seen, but the mass width is greater by 0.5 cm.Figure 1B—. Axial postcontrast CT image made at the same level as Figure 1A. Little contrast enhancement of the mass (arrows) is seen, but the mass width is greater by 0.5 cm.
Figure 1B Axial postcontrast CT image made at the same level as Figure 1A. Little contrast enhancement of the mass (arrows) is seen, but the mass width is greater by 0.5 cm.

Citation: Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 41, 5; 10.5326/0410292

Figure 1C—. Sagittal reconstruction postcontrast CT image. A radiopaque mass (arrows) is present in the pituitary fossa.Figure 1C—. Sagittal reconstruction postcontrast CT image. A radiopaque mass (arrows) is present in the pituitary fossa.Figure 1C—. Sagittal reconstruction postcontrast CT image. A radiopaque mass (arrows) is present in the pituitary fossa.
Figure 1C Sagittal reconstruction postcontrast CT image. A radiopaque mass (arrows) is present in the pituitary fossa.

Citation: Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 41, 5; 10.5326/0410292

Footnotes

    Doctor Flatland’s current address is the Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996.

References

  • 1
    Norman EJ, Mooney CT. Diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus in five cats with somatotrophic abnormalities. J Feline Med Surg 2000;2:183–190.
  • 2
    Abraham LA, Helmond SE, Mitten RW, et al. Treatment of an acromegalic cat with the dopamine agonist L-deprenyl. Aust Vet J 2002;80:479–483.
  • 3
    Goosens MMC, Feldman EC, Nelson RW, et al. Cobalt60 irradiation of pituitary gland tumors in three cats with acromegaly. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998; 213:374–376.
  • 4
    Peterson ME, Taylor RS, Greco DS, et al. Acromegaly in 14 cats. J Vet Intern Med 1990;4:192–201.
  • 5
    Morrison SA, Randolph J, Lothrop CD. Hypersomatotropism and insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus in a cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989;194:91–94.
  • 6
    Feldman EC, Nelson RW. Diabetes mellitus. In: Feldman EC, Nelson RW, eds. Canine and Feline Endocrinology and Reproduction. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1996:339–391.
  • 7
    Melmed S, Ho K, Klibanski A, et al. Recent advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995;80:3395–3402.
  • 8
    Bruyette DS. Feline endocrinology update. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2001;31:1063–1081.
  • 9
    Leung KC, Howe C, Gui LYY, et al. Physiological and pharmacological regulation of 20-kDa growth hormone. Am J Physio Endocrinol Metab 2002;283:E836–E843.
  • 10
    O’Sullivan AJ, Kelly JJ, Hoffman DM, et al. Body composition and energy expenditure in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994;78:381–386.
  • 11
    Feldman EC, Nelson RW. Acromegaly and hyperadrenocorticism in cats: a clinical perspective. J Feline Med Surg 2000;2:153–158.
  • 12
    Rosenfeld RG, Wilson DM, Dollar LA, et al. Both human pituitary growth hormone and recombinant DNA-derived human growth hormone cause insulin resistance at a post-receptor site. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1982;54:1033–1038.
  • 13
    Muggeo M, Bar RS, Roth J, et al. The insulin resistance of acromegaly: evidence for two alterations in the insulin receptor on circulating monocytes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1979;48:17–25.
  • 14
    Hansen I, Tsalikian E, Beaufrere B, et al. Insulin resistance in acromegaly: defects in both hepatic and extrahepatic insulin action. Am J Physiol 1986;250:269–273.
  • 15
    Elliott DA, Feldman EC, Koblik PD, et al. Prevalence of pituitary tumors among diabetic cats with insulin resistance. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000;216:1765–1768.
  • 16
    Abrams-Ogg ACG, Holmberg DL, Stewart WA, et al. Acromegaly in a cat: diagnosis by magnetic resonance imaging and treatment by cryohypophysectomy. Can Vet J 1993;34:682–685.
  • 17
    Middleton DJ, Culvenor JA, Vasak E, et al. Growth hormone-producing pituitary adenoma, elevated serum somatomedin C concentration and diabetes mellitus in a cat. Can Vet J 1985;26:169–171.
  • 18
    Lichtensteiger CA, Wortman JA, Eigenmann JE. Functional pituitary acidophil adenoma in a cat with diabetes mellitus and acromegalic features. Vet Pathol 1986;23:518–521.
  • 19
    Drake WM, Parkinson C, Akker SA, et al. Successful treatment of resistant acromegaly with a growth hormone receptor antagonist. Eur J Endocrin 2001; 145:451–456.
  • 20
    Zapf J, Froesch ER. Pathophysiological and clinical aspects of the insulin-like growth factors. Horm Res 1986;24:160–165.
  • 21
    Lewitt MS, Hazel SJ, Church DB, et al. Regulation of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 ternary complex in feline diabetes mellitus. J Endocrinol 2000;166:21–27.
  • 22
    Eigenmann JE, Wortman JA, Haskins ME. Elevated growth hormone levels and diabetes mellitus in a cat with acromegalic features. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1984;20:747–752.
  • 23
    Heinrichs M, Baumgartner W, Krug-Manntz S. Immunocytochemical demonstration of growth hormone in an acidophil adenoma of the adenohypophysis in a cat. Vet Pathol 1989;26:179–180.
  • 24
    Wolfsheimer KJ. Problems in diabetes mellitus management. Probl Vet Med 1990;2:591–601.
  • 25
    Kittleson MD, Pion PD, DeLellis LA, et al. Increased serum growth hormone concentration in feline hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Vet Intern Med 1992;6:320–324.
  • 26
    Casanueva FF. Physiology of growth hormone secretion and action. Endocrin Metab Clin North Am 1992;21:483–517.
  • 27
    Hartman ML, Veldhuis JD, Vance ML, et al. Somatotrophin pulse frequency and basal concentrations are increased in acromegaly and are reduced by successful therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990;70:1375–1384.
  • 28
    Dimaraki EV, Jaffe CA, DeMott-Friberg R, et al. Acromegaly with apparently normal GH secretion: implications for diagnosis and follow-up. J Clin Endocrin Metab 2002;87:3537–3542.
  • 29
    Grinspoon S, Clemmons D, Swearingen B, et al. Serum insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 levels in the diagnosis of acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995;80:927–932.
  • 30
    Rajasoorya C, Holdaway IM, Wrightson P, et al. Determinants of clinical outcome and survival in acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1994;41:95–102.
  • 31
    Giustina A, Barkan A, Casanueva FF, et al. Criteria for cure of acromegaly: a consensus statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:526–529.
  • 32
    Gittoes NJL, Sheppard MC, Johnson AP, et al. Outcome of surgery for acromegaly—the experience of a dedicated pituitary surgeon. QJM 1999;92:741–745.
  • 33
    Gutt B, Hatzack C, Morrison K, et al. Conventional pituitary irradiation is effective in normalizing plasma IGF-I in patients with acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol 2001;144:109–116.
  • 34
    Biermasz NR, van Dulken H, Roelfsema F. Long term follow up results of post-operative radiotherapy in 36 patients with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrin Metab 2000;85:2476–2482.
  • 35
    Fossum TW, Hedlund CS, Hulse DA, et al., eds. Small Animal Surgery. St. Louis: Mosby, 1997:410–414.
  • 36
    Cozzi R, Barausse M, Asnaghi D, et al. Failure of radiotherapy in acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol 2001;145:717–726.
  • 37
    Barkan AL, Halasz I, Dornfield KJ, et al. Pituitary irradiation is ineffective in normalizing plasma insulin-like growth factor I in patients with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997;82:3187–3191.
  • 38
    Powell JS, Wardlaw SL, Post KD, et al. Outcome of radiotherapy for acromegaly using normalization on insulin-like growth factor 1 to define cure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:2068–2071.
  • 39
    Landolt AM, Haller D, Lomax N, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent surgically treated acromegaly: comparison with fractionated radiotherapy. J Neurosurg 1998;88:1002–1008.
  • 40
    Turner HE, Wass JAH. Modern approaches to treating acromegaly (editorial). QJM 2000;93:1–6.
  • 41
    Newman CB, Melmed S, George A, et al. Octreotide as primary therapy for acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;83:3034–3040.
  • 42
    Kopchick JJ, Parkinson C, Stevens EC, et al. Growth hormone receptor antagonists: discovery, development, and use in patients with acromegaly. Endocrine Rev 2002;23:623–646.
  • 43
    Bevan JS, Atkin SL, Atkinson AB, et al. Primary medical therapy for acromegaly: an open, prospective, multicenter study of the effects of subcutaneous and intramuscular slow-release octreotide on growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor-1, and tumor size. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:4554–4563.
  • 44
    Trainer PJ, Drake WM, Katznelson L, et al. Treatment of acromegaly with the growth-hormone receptor antagonist pegvisomant. New Eng J Med 2000;342:1171–1177.
  • 45
    Sesmilo G, Fairchild WP, Katznelson L, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors in acromegaly before and after normalization of serum IGF-1 levels with the GH antagonist pegvisomant. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:1692–1699.
  • 46
    Reubi JC, Landolt AM. High density of somatostatin receptors in pituitary tumors from acromegalic patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1984;59:1148–1151.
  • 47
    Williams G, Ball JA, Burrin JM, et al. Effective and lasting growth hormone suppression in active acromegaly with oral administration of somatostatin analogue SMS 201-95. Lancet 1986;2:774–778.
  • 48
    Melmed S, Casanueva FF, Cavagnini F, et al. Guidelines for acromegaly management. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:4054–4058.
Copyright: Copyright 2005 by The American Animal Hospital Association 2005
<bold>
  <italic toggle="yes">Figure 1A</italic>
</bold>
—
Figure 1A

Axial precontrast computed tomography (CT) image at the level of the pituitary fossa. An approximate 1-cm diameter, radiopaque mass (arrows) is present in the midline at the level of the pituitary gland.


<bold>
  <italic toggle="yes">Figure 1B</italic>
</bold>
—
Figure 1B

Axial postcontrast CT image made at the same level as Figure 1A. Little contrast enhancement of the mass (arrows) is seen, but the mass width is greater by 0.5 cm.


<bold>
  <italic toggle="yes">Figure 1C</italic>
</bold>
—
Figure 1C

Sagittal reconstruction postcontrast CT image. A radiopaque mass (arrows) is present in the pituitary fossa.


Contributor Notes

Address all correspondence to Dr. Flatland.
  • Download PDF