Editorial Type: Anesthesia
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Nov 2002

Cardiopulmonary Effects of Intrathoracic Insufflation in Dogs

DVM,
DVM, MS, Diplomate ACVS,
BVSc, PhD, Diplomate ACVIM (Cardiology), and
VMD, Diplomate ACVS
Article Category: Research Article
Page Range: 515 – 520
DOI: 10.5326/0380515
Save
Download PDF

This study was designed to quantify the effects of incremental positive insufflation of the intrathoracic space on cardiac output (CO), heart rate (HR), arterial pressure (AP), central venous pressure (CVP), and percent saturation of hemoglobin with oxygen (SPO2) in anesthetized dogs. Seven healthy, adult dogs from terminal teaching laboratories were maintained under anesthesia with isoflurane delivered with a mechanical ventilator. The experimental variables were recorded before introduction of an intrathoracic catheter, at intrathoracic pressures (IP) of 0 mm Hg, 3 mm Hg insufflation, and additional increments of 1 mm Hg insufflation thereafter until the SPO2 remained <85% despite increases in minute volume. Finally the variables were measured again at 0 mm Hg IP. The cardiac output and systolic and diastolic AP significantly (P<0.05) decreased at 3 mm Hg IP. Significant decreases in SPO2 were seen at 10 mm Hg IP. Significant increase in CVP was noted at 6 mm Hg IP. Heart rate decreased significantly at 5 to 6 mm Hg IP but was not decreased above 6 mm Hg IP. Given the degree of CO decrease at low intrathoracic pressures, insufflation-aided thoracoscopy should be used with caution and at the lowest possible insufflation pressure. Standard anesthetic monitoring variables such as HR and AP measurements may not accurately reflect the animal’s cardiovascular status.

Introduction

The use of minimally invasive surgery as a diagnostic modality and therapeutic tool is increasing in both the human and veterinary fields. Potential benefits of minimally invasive surgery over conventional techniques include decreased pain, healing time, and postoperative complications.1–4 With the advent of variable angled rigid scopes and flexible endoscopes, the number and variety of surgical procedures being attempted via minimally invasive surgery are rapidly increasing.1–11

Thoracoscopy can be performed with or without carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation of the thoracic cavity. However, laparoscopy requires insufflation to allow visualization of the abdominal viscera. Currently most thoracoscopy procedures in humans are performed without insufflation.1312 One main-stem bronchus is intubated with a specialized endotracheal tube to allow ventilation of the intubated lung and passive collapse of the nonintubated lung. Alternately, one lung is blocked with a specialized endotracheal tube with a balloon-tipped stilet to allow passive or active insufflation-aided collapse of the blocked lung and ventilation of the nonblocked lung.48–12 Visualization of the thoracic cavity is primarily limited to the site of lung collapse. The available sizes of these specialized endobronchial tubes and the patient’s disease condition may limit the use of single lung-lobe intubation.

The incomplete mediastinum in the dog allows CO2 insufflation to increase visualization of the entire thoracic cavity compared to single lung intubation. In addition, CO2 insufflation without single lung-lobe intubation does not require bronchoscopic confirmation of endotracheal tube placement and is technically easier to perform, which can speed lung collapse and thereby reduce operative time.348–12 There are no size restrictions for patients, and the technique can be performed on patients with diffuse lung pathology that cannot tolerate single lung ventilation. Recommendations for upper limits of intrathoracic pressure with insufflation of the thoracic cavity in humans and dogs are 8 to 10 mm Hg.13 However, physiological effects of these intrathoracic pressures on cardiac output (CO) and oxygen (O2) delivery in dogs have not been thoroughly evaluated.146913 In contrast, laparoscopy and the effects of abdominal insufflation on cardiovascular physiology are well documented, and an upper safe limit has been demonstrated.12 The significant and severe cardiovascular effects caused by abdominal insufflation demonstrate the need for studies on the effects of intrathoracic insufflation.

The purpose of this study is to quantify the effects of incremental positive-pressure insufflation of the intrathoracic cavity in anesthetized dogs on CO, arterial pressure (AP), central venous pressure (CVP), heart rate (HR), and the percent saturation of hemoglobin with oxygen (SPO2).

Materials and Methods

This study was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at Washington State University. Seven male, mixed-breed dogs weighing 20 to 38 kg were used for this study. All animals were screened for health by physical examination, packed cell volume, total protein, and electrocardiogram (ECG). The dogs were premedicated with acepromazine (0.05 mg/kg body weight, intramuscularly [IM]), atropine (0.04 mg/kg body weight [IM]), and butorphanol (0.2 mg/kg body weight [IM]). Anesthesia was induced with sodium thiopental (10 mg/kg body weight, intravenously [IV]). The dogs were intubated, and a medium plane of anesthesia (i.e., stable respiration and heart rate, abolished laryngeal and palpebral reflexes, and profound muscle relaxation) was established. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in O2 delivered to a semi-closed circle anesthetic machinea by a precision out-of-circle vaporizer.b The dogs were placed on and under circulating heated water blankets to reduce heat loss. Lactated Ringer’s solution was administered IV at 20 mL/kg body weight per hour for the first hour, followed by 10 mL/kg body weight per hour for each subsequent hour under anesthesia. All dogs were part of a terminal surgery teaching laboratory and underwent exploratory laparotomy and visceral biopsies prior to undergoing this experiment. Significant bleeding was not noted in any dog during the laboratory procedures preceding the experimental study.

Once abdominal closure was completed, the dogs were transferred to the experiment group. Anesthesia was maintained with a vaporizer setting of 1.5% isoflurane in O2 throughout the experiment. An incision was made over the right ventral cervical region, and the right carotid artery was exposed and catheterizedc to allow measurement of AP. A 30-cm catheterd was placed percutaneously in the left jugular vein, with the tip in the cranial vena cava located near the right atrium to measure CVP. The AP and CVP were each measured directly using a calibrated pressure transducere connected to a physiological recorder.f

An 8-French catheter introducerg was placed into the right jugular vein, and a thermodilution catheterh was placed to measure CO. Proper placement of the thermodilution catheter was confirmed by obtaining characteristic pulmonary arterial pressure waveforms, displayed on an oscilloscope, during insertion of the catheter. To measure CO, 5 mL boluses of 5% dextrose solution, chilled to 5° to 8°C, were administered through the proximal port of the thermodilution catheter immediately following the expiratory phase of ventilation. A computeri was used to measure CO.

A pulse oximeter was placed on the animal’s tongue to monitor SPO2.j A thermometer probej was inserted 10 cm into the rectum to measure core body temperature. Heart rate was monitored using the pulse oximeter and continuous ECG.

The dogs were then placed on mechanical ventilation.k Respiratory rate was initially set at 12 breaths per minute with a tidal volume of 20 to 24 mL/kg body weight, which was sufficient to cause a maximal inspiratory pressure of 25 cm H2O. Once the catheters were secured, the dogs were positioned in right lateral recumbency. After 5 minutes of stabilization, experimental variables CO, systolic and diastolic AP, SPO2, CVP, HR, ventilation rate, and temperature were recorded immediately following expiration in the ventilation cycle. Mean arterial blood pressure was inadvertently not recorded due to an error in the design of the study variables record sheet used during the experiment.

A blunt metal urinary catheterl was inserted through a small skin incision at the left fifth intercostal space and introduced into the intrathoracic cavity. The pressure of the intrathoracic cavity was allowed to equilibrate with atmospheric pressure (0 mm Hg), and after 5 minutes of stabilization, the baseline experimental variables were recorded.

A CO2 insufflatorm was attached to the blunt metal urinary catheter via a three-way stopcock to regulate intrathoracic pressure (IP). Intrathoracic pressure was increased to 3 mm Hg (the lowest setting allowed by the insufflator), and experimental variables were recorded after 5 minutes. Intrathoracic pressure was increased by increments of 1 mm Hg, and after 5 minutes at each new pressure, the experimental variables were recorded. As IP increased, tidal volume and respiratory rate were adjusted to maintain SPO2 >85%. However, maximum inspiratory pressure was maintained <25 cm H2O [18 mm Hg] above IP to protect the lungs from hyperinflation trauma.14,15 Once SPO2 remained <85% despite increases in minute volume, insufflation was discontinued and the CO2 was released from the pleural cavity. After IP returned to atmospheric pressure for 5 minutes, the experimental variables were again recorded.

The dogs were euthanized at the end of the study with pentobarbital (395 mg/2 kg body weight, IV).

Data was analyzed using a one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Pairwise comparisons were performed using a Dunnet’s test, with values obtained at baseline before introduction of the intrathoracic catheter as the controls. Significance was set at P≤0.05.

Results

Mean core body temperature before insufflation was 35.0°C, and no change in core temperature occurred in any of the dogs during the experiment. Four dogs were under anesthesia for 6 hours prior to measurement of baseline experimental variables. Three dogs were under anesthesia for 8.5 hours prior to measurement of baseline experimental variables. The median time to complete the experiment once the animals were instrumented was 110 minutes. No significant differences in experimental variables were found between these two groups. Consequently, data from all seven dogs was pooled for the subsequent analyses.

Results of increasing IP on CO, AP, SPO2, CVP, and HR are recorded in the Table. Cardiac output and systolic and diastolic APs decreased significantly at 3 mm Hg IP. Significant decreases in SPO2 were noted at 10 mm Hg IP. Significant increase in CVP was noted at 6 mm Hg IP. Heart rate was significantly decreased at 5 to 6 mm Hg IP.

Discussion

Cardiac output decreased significantly with minimal insufflation of the intrathoracic cavity and dropped by almost 50% from baseline at 10 mm Hg, which is the recommended maximum safe insufflation pressure.13 Similar results were reported for pigs in which cardiac index (CI) decreased by 70% when IP was increased to 10 mm Hg during thoracic insufflation.16 One study, in which single lung intubation and intrathoracic insufflation were used, experienced marked cardiovascular compromise when the IP was inadvertently allowed to rise above 8 mm Hg.4 While the exact mechanism for a decrease in CO is not known, it has been hypothesized that an increase in IP above atmospheric pressure collapses central veins and increases pulmonary resistance.16–19 This combination of events decreases the volume of blood returning to the heart and increases the pressure required to eject blood from the right heart. The end result is a decrease in stroke volume and CO. In the pig study, CI returned to within 5% of baseline levels after insufflation was discontinued, and IP decreased to atmospheric pressure.16 Similar results were obtained in this study and in the study in which IPs in dogs were inadvertently increased above 8 mm Hg.4 This suggests that the decrease in CO observed during intrathoracic insufflation is only a transient event and completely reversible following normalization of IP.

The effect of thoracic insufflation on HR is difficult to understand because of the multitude of factors that control HR.20 In this study, the HR remained essentially unchanged throughout almost the entire range of IPs, and it was slightly decreased at IPs of 5 and 6 mm Hg. This effect on HR occurred despite the fact that both systolic and diastolic APs were significantly decreased at an IP of only 3 mm Hg, and both continued to drop further throughout the range of IPs attained in this study. The authors had anticipated that decreased arterial blood pressure would result in an increase in HR.20 However, the net effect of the various reflexes responsible for controlling HR resulted in little change, or even a small decrease in HR, despite the significant drop in arterial blood pressure observed during thoracic insufflation.

Both systolic and diastolic APs decreased significantly at 3 mm Hg IP. Surprisingly, the systolic AP, while decreased significantly, did not fall below clinically acceptable levels of 80 mm Hg or to the degree that might be expected considering the marked decrease in CO.21 Arterial pressure is the result of blood volume in the vessel as well as the tone of the smooth muscle in the vessel wall. These, in turn, are determined by CO, baroreceptor reflexes, and centrally mediated nervous responses to arterial blood pressure.22 The authors suggest that the decrease in systolic and diastolic APs is predominantly the result of the decrease in CO. The reason that the systolic AP did not drop as low as may have been expected, compared to the marked drop in CO, is unclear. The other factors that affect AP may have increased blood pressure either to overcome the higher CVP created by the increased IP, or in response to centrally mediated nervous detection of decreased AP. A similar comparison of diastolic AP decreases being “clinically” relevant was not possible because the clinical significance of diastolic AP as a cardiovascular monitoring parameter has not been clearly defined. Diastolic AP was the only experimental parameter that failed to return to within 5% of baseline after the positive IP was removed. This may be the result of not allowing the diastolic AP enough time to return to preexperimental levels, or it may indicate that there are some nontransient effects of positive-pressure intrathoracic insufflation. The authors suspect that this was due to not allowing the diastolic AP enough time to return to preexperimental levels, but the possibility of some nontransient effects of positive-pressure intrathoracic insufflation on diastolic AP cannot be excluded.

Central venous pressure increased in direct relationship to IP. Under normal circumstances, CVP is a function of venous return and ability of the heart to pump blood from the right atrium. Further, an increase in CVP would usually be expected to increase CO via the Frank-Starling mechanism. However, with increased IP due to thoracic insufflation, CVP increases due to extramural pressure on central veins. This, in turn, increases resistance to blood returning to the heart, thereby decreasing CO despite an increase in CVP.

The SPO2 did not decline in this study until IP exceeded 9 mm Hg. Gross estimates of partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) can be determined by extrapolation from SPO2 using the O2-hemoglobin saturation curve.21,23 At 8 mm Hg IP, PaO2 was estimated in the authors’ study to be >50 mm Hg, the minimum acceptable level for maintaining normal O2 delivery to the body.21 However, SPO2 is not a direct measurement of O2 delivery to the tissues.24 Flow rate and volume also contribute to O2 delivery; therefore, local tissue hypoxia may occur in patients with low CO and a normal pulmonary system despite normal SPO2 values.21 The end result is that a patient being monitored by SPO2 as an indicator of tissue oxygenation may suffer significant, life-threatening tissue hypoxia despite a normal SPO2.

The animals used for this experiment were chosen because the authors felt that they would be adequate models, provided that there was not excessive hemorrhage or other complications during the teaching laboratory. Prolonged isoflurane anesthesia up to 4.5 hours has not been shown to have significant effects on CO and HR.25 While temporal effects of isoflurane anesthesia have been seen in other species (i.e., horses and humans), there are currently no studies demonstrating the effects of isoflurane anesthesia and recumbency in dogs for >4.5 hours.2627 In addition, comparisons with other species and anesthetic gases are difficult to support, as the type of gas and species can dramatically affect cardiopulmonary variables. In addition, the use of animals already slated for euthanasia decreased the number of animals required for terminal experiments.

A number of recent articles in the veterinary literature have shown that different degrees of intrathoracic visualization are required, depending on the procedure being performed.47–10132829 For the most part, these studies evaluate models where insufflation was not performed (e.g., passive insufflation alone) or was performed using single lung-lobe intubation and short-duration insufflation to speed collapse of the nonintubated lung. In these studies, the authors have concluded or postulated that insufflation may increase visualization and can be helpful or required in order to complete the surgery.47–10

Conclusion

Because of associated significant and severe decreases in CO at even low IPs, sustained positive-pressure thoracoscopy should be used with caution in dogs. There are no reported critical lower limits of CO; therefore, a specific or safe IP to remain at or below cannot be ascertained from the data of this study. However, the authors conclude that increased IP and duration of insufflation should be kept to a minimum to decrease the negative effects on CO. The authors also conclude that the variables routinely used to monitor patients under anesthesia, such as AP and HR, may not be reliable indicators of cardiovascular status in dogs undergoing insufflation-aided thoracoscopy. The authors suggest that SPO2 and serial blood gases in addition to the routinely measured variables may be better indicators of the cardiovascular status in dogs undergoing insufflation-aided thoracoscopy.

Alternatives to sustained positive-pressure intrathoracic insufflation include short-term positive-pressure intrathoracic insufflation, single lung ventilation, or a combination of these techniques. Single lung intubation is associated with fewer cardiopulmonary changes when compared to the results of this study.4101130 Further studies are required to evaluate the extent of intrathoracic visualization provided and the cardiopulmonary effects produced by all of the above techniques in dogs.

Fraser Harlake Model VMC; Fraser Harlake Inc., Orchard Park, NY

Iso Tec III; Division of BOC Inc., West Yorkshire, England

20-gauge 1-inch Novolan IV catheter; Becton-Dickinson Infusion Therapy Systems, Sandy, UT

19-gauge 12-inch IV catheter; Becton Dickinson Vascular Access, Sandy, UT

Transpac II pressure transducer; Abbott Critical Care Systems, North Chicago, IL

Physio-Control patient monitor, model VSM-5; Physio-Control Inc., Redmond WA

8-F catheter introducer; USCI, Division of Bard, Billerica, MA

Swan-Ganz 7-French Thermodilution catheter; Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Irvine, CA

Com-1, Cardiac output computer; American Edwards Laboratories, Santa Ana, CA

Vetox Plus 4600 pulse oximetry; Sensor Devices Inc., Waukesha, WI

Fraser Harlake Model 700 mechanical ventilator; Fraser Harlake Inc., Orchard Park, NY

18 cm by 2.5 mm canine female catheter; Jorgensen Laboratories, Loveland, CO

620–30 High Flow Insufflator; Stryker Endoscopy, San Jose, CA

Table Intrathoracic Insufflation in Dogs

          Table

Footnotes

    Presented at the 9th Annual American College of Veterinary Surgeons Symposium, San Francisco, California, October 1999.

References

  • 1
    Remedios AM, Ferguson J. Minimally invasive surgery: laparoscopy and thoracoscopy in small animals. Comp Cont Ed Pract Vet 1996; 18:1191–1199.
  • 2
    Rothuizen J. Laproscopy in small animal medicine. Vet Quart 1985; 7:225–228.
  • 3
    Kessler RM. Modern diagnostic and therapeutic thoracoscopy. In: Hunter JG, Sackier JM, eds. Minimally invasive surgery. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1994:320–338.
  • 4
    Walsh PJ, Remedious AM, Ferguson JF, et al. Thoracoscopic versus open partial pericardectomy in dogs: comparison of postoperative pain and morbidity. Vet Surg 1999;28:472–479.
  • 5
    Gallagher LA, Freeman LJ, Thompson SE, et al. Partial pericardectomy in the canine performed by imaged thoracic surgery. Abstract. Vet Surg 1992;21:389.
  • 6
    McCarthy TC, McDermid SL. Thoracoscopy. Vet Clin North Am: Sm Anim Pract 1990;20:1341–1352.
  • 7
    Jackson J, Richter KP, Launer DP. Thoracoscopic partial pericardectomy in 13 dogs. J Vet Intern Med 1999;13:529–533.
  • 8
    Dupre G, Corlouer JP, Bouvy B. Thoracoscopic pericardectomy performed without pulmonary exclusion in 9 dogs. Vet Surg 2001;30:21–27.
  • 9
    Isakow K, Fowler D, Walsh P. Video-assisted thoracoscopic division of the ligamentum arteriosum in two dogs with persistent right aortic arch. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000;217:1333–1336.
  • 10
    Garcia F, Prandi D, Pena T, et al. Examination of the thoracic cavity and lung lobectomy by means of thoracoscopy in dogs. Can J Vet Med 1998;39:285–291.
  • 11
    McCarthy TC. Diagnostic thoracoscopy. Clin Tech Sm Anim Pract 1999;14:213–219.
  • 12
    Hasnain JU, Krasna MJ. Anesthetic, equipment, and pathophysiologic considerations of thoracoscopic surgery. In: Bailey R, ed. Complications of laparoscopic surgery. St. Louis: QMP, 1994:362–370.
  • 13
    Faunt KK, Cohn LA, Jones BD, et al. Cardiopulmonary effects of bilateral hemithorax ventilation and diagnostic thoracoscopy in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1998;59:1494–1498.
  • 14
    Hartsfield SM. Airway management and ventilation. Monitoring the anesthetized patient. In: Thurmons JC, Tranquilli WJ, Benson GJ, eds. Lumb & Jones’ veterinary anesthesia. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkens, 1996:515–556.
  • 15
    Kumar A, Pontoppidan H, Konrad FJ, et al. Pulmonary barotrauma during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 1973;1:181–186.
  • 16
    Jones DR, Graeber GM, Tanguilig GG, et al. Effects of insufflation on hemodynamics during thoracoscopy. Ann Thor Surg 1993;55:1379–1382.
  • 17
    Bennett RA, Orton EC, Tucker A, et al. Cardiopulmonary changes in conscious dogs with induced progressive pneumothorax. Am J Vet Res 1989;50:280–284.
  • 18
    Bjorling DE, Whitfield JB. High frequency jet ventilation during pneumothorax in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1986;47:1984–1987.
  • 19
    Simmons DH, Hemingway A, Ricchiuti N. Acute circulatory effects of pneumothorax in dogs. J Appl Phys 1958;12:255–261.
  • 20
    Berne RM, Levy MN. Regulation of the heartbeat. In: Berne RM, Levy MN, eds. Physiology. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1998:379–398.
  • 21
    Haskins SC. Monitoring the anesthetized patient. In: Thurmons JC, Tranquilli WJ, Benson GJ, eds. Lumb & Jones’ veterinary anesthesia. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkens, 1996:409–425.
  • 22
    Berne RM, Levy MN. The arterial system. In: Berne RM, Levy MN, eds. Physiology. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1998:415–428.
  • 23
    Bartels H, Hilpert P, Riegel K. Blood O2 dissociation curves: mammals. Part III. Cat, dog, pig, sea lion. In: Dittmer DS, ed. Blood and other body fluids. Washington, DC: Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 1961:149–156.
  • 24
    Cheney FW, Colley PS. The effect of cardiac output on arterial blood oxygenation. Anesth 1980;52:496–503.
  • 25
    Dunlop CI, Hodgson DS, Chapman PL, et al. Time related effects of isoflurane anesthesia in dogs (abstr). Presented at 3rd Int Congr Vet Anaesth, Brisbane, Australia, 1988.
  • 26
    Steffey EP, Hodgson DS, Dunlop CI, et al. Cardiopulmonary function during 5 hours of constant-dose isoflurane in laterally recumbent, spontaneously breathing horses. J Vet Pharm Ther 1987;10:290–297.
  • 27
    Pearson J. Prolonged anesthesia with isoflurane. Anesth and Analg 1985;64:92–93.
  • 28
    De Rycke LM, Gielen IM, Polis I, Van Ryssen B, van Bree HJ, Simoens PJ. Thoracoscopic anatomy of dogs positioned in right lateral recumbency. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2001;37:543–548.
  • 29
    MacPhail CM, Monnet E, Twedt DC. Thoracoscopic correction of persistent right aortic arch in a dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2001;37:577–581.
  • 30
    Cantwell SL, Duke T, Walker D, et al. One-lung versus two-lung ventilation in the closed chest anesthetized dog: a comparison of cardiopulmonary parameters. Vet Surg 2000;29:365–373.
Copyright: Copyright 2002 by The American Animal Hospital Association 2002

Contributor Notes

Address all reprint requests to Dr. Daly, Foster Hospital for Small Animals, School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, 200 Westboro Road, North Grafton, Massachusetts 01536.
  • Download PDF